Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Isabelle DenisMonique LavialleSylvie VancasselPhilippe GuesnetJean‐Marc AlessandriBénédicte LangelierSaba AïdPierre Astorg
- Topics
- Fatty Acid Research and Health (8 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Nutrition
- Partner nations
- FranceMoroccoUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar
15 papers receiving 678 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Nutrition and Dietetics 371
- Physiology 220
- Molecular Biology 170
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
- Biochemistry 86
Countries citing papers authored by Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar
This map shows the geographic impact of Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar. The network helps show where Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar. Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 61 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 77 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 53 | |
| 15 | 233 | |
| 16 | 33 |
About Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar
Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fatty Acid Research and Health (8 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (371 citations), Biological Psychiatry (44 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (48 citations). Gaëlle Champeil‐Potokar has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Isabelle Denis, Monique Lavialle, Sylvie Vancassel, Philippe Guesnet, Jean‐Marc Alessandri, Bénédicte Langelier, Saba Aïd, Pierre Astorg, Marie Hennebelle and Laure Balasse. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.