G. Hasinger

34.4k total citations · 4 hit papers
267 papers, 7.9k citations indexed

About

G. Hasinger is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Hasinger has authored 267 papers receiving a total of 7.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 232 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 94 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 38 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in G. Hasinger's work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (187 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (120 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (69 papers). G. Hasinger is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (187 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (120 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (69 papers). G. Hasinger collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. G. Hasinger's co-authors include T. Miyaji, Maarten Schmidt, V. Mainieri, G. Szokoly, R. Gilli, P. Rosati, J. Bergeron, I. Lehmann, R. Giacconi and P. Tozzi and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Reviews of Modern Physics and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

G. Hasinger

252 papers receiving 7.7k citations

Hit Papers

Discovery of a Binary Act... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 2014 2002 2002 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
G. Hasinger 7.6k 2.7k 1.6k 258 224 267 7.9k
M. Elvis 11.8k 1.6× 4.7k 1.7× 1.4k 0.8× 417 1.6× 137 0.6× 351 12.1k
E. Churazov 8.5k 1.1× 3.3k 1.2× 904 0.6× 254 1.0× 437 2.0× 343 8.8k
G. Fabbiano 7.2k 1.0× 2.7k 1.0× 801 0.5× 269 1.0× 128 0.6× 247 7.4k
N. Gehrels 8.1k 1.1× 2.7k 1.0× 731 0.4× 133 0.5× 300 1.3× 201 8.4k
G. P. Garmire 9.5k 1.3× 3.6k 1.3× 899 0.5× 423 1.6× 457 2.0× 281 10.0k
A. Vikhlinin 9.1k 1.2× 3.2k 1.2× 2.1k 1.3× 298 1.2× 79 0.4× 168 9.4k
I. F. Mirabel 6.3k 0.8× 2.3k 0.8× 910 0.6× 169 0.7× 249 1.1× 168 6.4k
K. Nandra 10.0k 1.3× 3.7k 1.3× 1.3k 0.8× 517 2.0× 274 1.2× 239 10.4k
Julian H. Krolik 10.0k 1.3× 3.4k 1.2× 857 0.5× 404 1.6× 477 2.1× 197 10.4k
Francesco Haardt 6.7k 0.9× 2.1k 0.8× 865 0.5× 213 0.8× 172 0.8× 114 6.8k

Countries citing papers authored by G. Hasinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hasinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hasinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hasinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hasinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hasinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hasinger. The network helps show where G. Hasinger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Hasinger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Hasinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Hasinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Hasinger. G. Hasinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cappelluti, N., Fabio Pacucci, & G. Hasinger. (2024). Constraining Wind-driven Accretion onto Gaia BH3 with Chandra. The Astrophysical Journal. 973(2). 75–75. 6 indexed citations
2.
Suh, Hyewon, J. Scharwächter, Emanuele Paolo Farina, et al.. (2024). A super-Eddington-accreting black hole ~1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang observed with JWST. Nature Astronomy. 9(2). 271–279. 5 indexed citations
3.
Cappelluti, N., G. Hasinger, & Priyamvada Natarajan. (2022). Exploring the High-redshift PBH-ΛCDM Universe: Early Black Hole Seeding, the First Stars and Cosmic Radiation Backgrounds. The Astrophysical Journal. 926(2). 205–205. 43 indexed citations
4.
Kashlinsky, A., Richard G. Arendt, N. Cappelluti, et al.. (2019). Probing the Cross-power of Unresolved Cosmic Infrared and X-Ray Backgrounds with Upcoming Space Missions. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 871(1). L6–L6. 8 indexed citations
5.
Li, Yanxia, N. Cappelluti, Richard G. Arendt, et al.. (2018). The SPLASH and Chandra COSMOS Legacy Survey: The Cross-power between Near-infrared and X-Ray Background Fluctuations. The Astrophysical Journal. 864(2). 141–141. 11 indexed citations
6.
Suh, Hyewon, F. Civano, G. Hasinger, et al.. (2017). Type 2 AGN Host Galaxies in the Chandra-COSMOS Legacy Survey: No Evidence of AGN-driven Quenching. The Astrophysical Journal. 841(2). 102–102. 23 indexed citations
7.
Cappelluti, N., Richard G. Arendt, A. Kashlinsky, et al.. (2017). Probing Large-scale Coherence between Spitzer IR and Chandra X-Ray Source-subtracted Cosmic Backgrounds. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 847(1). L11–L11. 18 indexed citations
8.
Allevato, V., F. Civano, A. Finoguenov, et al.. (2016). THE CHANDRA COSMOS LEGACY SURVEY: CLUSTERING OF X-RAY-SELECTED AGNs AT 2.9 ≤ z ≤ 5.5 USING PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. 832(1). 70–70. 18 indexed citations
9.
Daddi, E., M. Béthermin, M. Pannella, et al.. (2015). Satellite content and quenching of star formation in galaxy groups at z ~ 1.8. Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex). 9 indexed citations
10.
Miyaji, T., G. Hasinger, M. Salvato, et al.. (2015). DETAILED SHAPE AND EVOLUTIONARY BEHAVIOR OF THE X-RAY LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI. The Astrophysical Journal. 804(2). 104–104. 62 indexed citations
11.
Iwasawa, K., V. Mainieri, M. Brusa, et al.. (2012). Fe K emission from active galaxies in the COSMOS field. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 23 indexed citations
12.
Rovilos, E., S. Fotopoulou, M. Salvato, et al.. (2011). Optical and infrared properties of active galactic nuclei in the Lockman Hole. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 8 indexed citations
13.
Ciliegi, P., G. Zamorani, G. Hasinger, et al.. (2003). A deep VLA survey at 6 cm in the Lockman Hole. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 68 indexed citations
14.
Ishisaki, Yoshitaka, et al.. (2001). ASCA Deep survey in Lockman Hole Field. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 251. 458. 1 indexed citations
15.
Strüder, L., H. Bräuninger, G. Hasinger, et al.. (2001). Imaging Spectrometers for Future X-ray Missions. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 251. 200. 1 indexed citations
16.
Harris, D. E., J. D. Silverman, G. Hasinger, & I. Lehmann. (1998). Spatial corrections of ROSAT HRI observations. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 13 indexed citations
17.
Hasinger, G.. (1996). The extragalactic X-ray and gamma-ray background.. 120. 607–614. 5 indexed citations
18.
Hasinger, G., H. M. Johnston, & F. Verbunt. (1994). Discovery of multiple X-ray sources in 47 Tucanae. A&A. 288. 466–471. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hasinger, G., R. Burg, R. Giacconi, et al.. (1992). A deep X ray survey in the Lockman hole and the soft X ray log N - log S. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 275(1). 1–15. 14 indexed citations
20.
Belloni, T., G. Hasinger, W. Pietsch, et al.. (1992). ROSAT and optical observations of two X-ray transients: MX 0836-42 and GS 0834-430. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 271(2). 19451–491. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026