The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure
- Journal
- The Astrophysical Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1086/338339 →Countries where authors are citing The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure
This map shows the geographic impact of The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure
This network shows the impact of The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure.
About The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure
This paper, published in 2002, received 223 indexed citations . Written by P. Rosati, P. Tozzi, R. Giacconi, R. Gilli, G. Hasinger, Lisa J. Kewley, V. Mainieri, M. Nonino, Colin Norman and G. Szokoly covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (221 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (97 citations) and Instrumentation (38 citations). Published in The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1086/338339.