Anton M. Koekemoer

83.6k total citations · 5 hit papers
340 papers, 13.5k citations indexed

About

Anton M. Koekemoer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Anton M. Koekemoer has authored 340 papers receiving a total of 13.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 318 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 168 papers in Instrumentation and 47 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Anton M. Koekemoer's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (290 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (167 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (100 papers). Anton M. Koekemoer is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (290 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (167 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (100 papers). Anton M. Koekemoer collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Anton M. Koekemoer's co-authors include Norman A. Grogin, Henry C. Ferguson, M. Salvato, P. Capak, Richard S. Ellis, O. Ilbert, N. Z. Scoville, Mauro Giavalisco, Jonathan R. Trump and Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Anton M. Koekemoer

311 papers receiving 12.9k citations

Hit Papers

THE STAR FORMATION HISTOR... 2002 2026 2010 2018 2011 2012 2002 2013 2002 100 200 300
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. THE STAR FORMATION HISTORY OF MASS-SELECTED GALAXIES IN THE COSMOS FIELD
    2011 356 citations O. Ilbert, Anton M. Koekemoer et al. The Astrophysical Journal profile →
  2. IDENTIFYING LUMINOUS ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN DEEP SURVEYS: REVISED IRAC SELECTION CRITERIA
    2012 348 citations Anton M. Koekemoer, M. Brusa et al. The Astrophysical Journal profile →
  3. Chandra Deep Field South: The 1 Ms Catalog
    2002 342 citations M. Nonino, Norman A. Grogin et al. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series profile →
  4. NEW CONSTRAINTS ON COSMIC REIONIZATION FROM THE 2012 HUBBLE ULTRA DEEP FIELD CAMPAIGN
    2013 340 citations Anton M. Koekemoer et al. The Astrophysical Journal profile →
  5. The Chandra Deep Field–South: The 1 Million Second Exposure
    2002 223 citations M. Nonino, Norman A. Grogin et al. The Astrophysical Journal profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anton M. Koekemoer United States 63 13.1k 6.2k 2.7k 722 483 340 13.5k
Jean‐Paul Kneib France 62 11.6k 0.9× 5.8k 0.9× 2.1k 0.8× 1.2k 1.7× 393 0.8× 318 12.0k
S. Charlot France 55 15.9k 1.2× 8.1k 1.3× 1.7k 0.6× 511 0.7× 401 0.8× 178 16.3k
G. D. Illingworth United States 72 15.0k 1.1× 8.5k 1.4× 1.7k 0.6× 729 1.0× 513 1.1× 265 15.3k
Henry C. Ferguson United States 65 15.7k 1.2× 6.7k 1.1× 4.0k 1.5× 643 0.9× 386 0.8× 243 16.0k
Rachel S. Somerville United States 59 12.8k 1.0× 6.9k 1.1× 2.3k 0.9× 530 0.7× 463 1.0× 219 13.2k
Mauro Giavalisco United States 60 15.9k 1.2× 6.9k 1.1× 3.9k 1.5× 596 0.8× 404 0.8× 149 16.2k
Ian Smail United Kingdom 72 18.3k 1.4× 8.9k 1.4× 3.0k 1.1× 682 0.9× 312 0.6× 332 18.6k
Pieter van Dokkum United States 72 16.2k 1.2× 10.6k 1.7× 1.5k 0.6× 734 1.0× 543 1.1× 270 16.5k
J. Brinchmann Netherlands 47 12.6k 1.0× 5.9k 1.0× 1.6k 0.6× 349 0.5× 349 0.7× 138 12.9k
S. M. Faber United States 64 12.9k 1.0× 6.8k 1.1× 2.2k 0.8× 567 0.8× 376 0.8× 172 13.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Anton M. Koekemoer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anton M. Koekemoer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anton M. Koekemoer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anton M. Koekemoer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anton M. Koekemoer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anton M. Koekemoer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anton M. Koekemoer. The network helps show where Anton M. Koekemoer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anton M. Koekemoer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anton M. Koekemoer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anton M. Koekemoer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anton M. Koekemoer. Anton M. Koekemoer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pascale, Massimo, Rogier A. Windhorst, Anton M. Koekemoer, et al.. (2025). Microlensing at cosmological distances: Event rate predictions in the Warhol arc of MACS 0416. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 699. A295–A295. 1 indexed citations
2.
Simons, Raymond C., Jonathan R. Trump, Anthony J. Taylor, et al.. (2025). Here There Be (Dusty) Monsters: High-redshift Active Galactic Nuclei Are Dustier than Their Hosts. The Astrophysical Journal. 986(2). 177–177. 5 indexed citations
3.
Ueda, Yoshihiro, Kotaro Kohno, Yoshiki Toba, et al.. (2024). ALMA Lensing Cluster Survey: Full Spectral Energy Distribution Analysis of z ∼ 0.5–6 Lensed Galaxies Detected with millimeter Observations. The Astrophysical Journal. 965(2). 108–108. 4 indexed citations
4.
Morales, Alexa M., Steven L. Finkelstein, Gene C. K. Leung, et al.. (2024). Rest-frame UV Colors for Faint Galaxies at z ∼ 9–16 with the JWST NGDEEP Survey. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 964(2). L24–L24. 20 indexed citations
5.
Costantin, Luca, Pablo G. Pérez‐González, Jesús Vega-Ferrero, et al.. (2023). Expectations of the Size Evolution of Massive Galaxies at 3 ≤ z ≤ 6 from the TNG50 Simulation: The CEERS/JWST View. The Astrophysical Journal. 946(2). 71–71. 26 indexed citations
6.
Langeroodi, Danial, J. Hjorth, Wenlei Chen, et al.. (2023). Evolution of the Mass–Metallicity Relation from Redshift z ≈ 8 to the Local Universe. The Astrophysical Journal. 957(1). 39–39. 31 indexed citations
7.
Niemiec, Anna, Mathilde Jauzac, D. Eckert, et al.. (2023). Beyond the ultradeep frontier fields and legacy observations (BUFFALO): a high-resolution strong+weak-lensing view of Abell 370. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 524(2). 2883–2910. 7 indexed citations
8.
Pentericci, L., M. Talia, G. Cresci, et al.. (2022). Properties of the interstellar medium in star-forming galaxies at redshifts 2 ≤ z ≤ 5 from the VANDELS survey. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 667. A117–A117. 11 indexed citations
9.
Shuntov, Marko, H. J. McCracken, R. Gavazzi, et al.. (2022). COSMOS2020: Cosmic evolution of the stellar-to-halo mass relation for central and satellite galaxies up to z  ∼  5. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 664. A61–A61. 51 indexed citations
10.
Ebeling, H., Johan Richard, Ian Smail, et al.. (2021). An extreme case of galaxy and cluster co-evolution at z  = 0.7. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 508(3). 3663–3671. 3 indexed citations
11.
Siegel, Seth R., Jack Sayers, Andisheh Mahdavi, et al.. (2018). Constraints on the Mass, Concentration, and Nonthermal Pressure Support of Six CLASH Clusters from a Joint Analysis of X-Ray, SZ, and Lensing Data. The Astrophysical Journal. 861(1). 71–71. 16 indexed citations
12.
Castellano, M., L. Pentericci, A. Fontana, et al.. (2017). Optical Line Emission from z ∼ 6.8 Sources with Deep Constraints on Lyα Visibility. The Astrophysical Journal. 839(2). 73–73. 24 indexed citations
13.
Wong, Kenneth C., Kim‐Vy Tran, S. H. Suyu, et al.. (2014). DISCOVERY OF A STRONG LENSING GALAXY EMBEDDED IN A CLUSTER AT z = 1.62. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 789(2). L31–L31. 13 indexed citations
14.
Murata, Katsuhiro L., Masaru Kajisawa, Masakazu A. R. Kobayashi, et al.. (2014). EVOLUTION OF THE FRACTION OF CLUMPY GALAXIES AT 0.2 <z< 1.0 IN THE COSMOS FIELD. The Astrophysical Journal. 786(1). 15–15. 26 indexed citations
15.
Fauré, C., T. Anguita, D. Alloin, et al.. (2011). On the evolution of environmental and mass properties of strong lens galaxies in COSMOS. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 18 indexed citations
16.
Hao, Heng, M. Elvis, F. Civano, et al.. (2010). Hot-Dust-Poor Type 1 AGNs in the COSMOS Survey. arXiv (Cornell University).
17.
Jouvel, S., Jean‐Paul Kneib, O. Ilbert, et al.. (2009). Designing Future Dark Energy Space Missions: I. Building Realistic Galaxy Spectro-Photometric Catalogs and their first applications. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 34 indexed citations
18.
Robin, A. C., P. Capak, L. Tasca, et al.. (2007). The Stellar Content of the COSMOS Field as Derived from Morphological and SED‐based Star/Galaxy Separation. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 172(1). 545–559. 9 indexed citations
19.
Durand, Dannie, D. Schade, L. Simard, et al.. (2004). WFPC2 Associations Pipeline: Publishing HST archives within VO. ASPC. 314(10). 209–1200.
20.
Simmons, Brooke, C. M. Urry, Swara Ravindranath, et al.. (2004). Morphological Simulations of GOODS AGN Host Galaxies. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 205. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean‐Paul Kneib Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Charlot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. D. Illingworth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Henry C. Ferguson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel S. Somerville Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mauro Giavalisco Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ian Smail Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pieter van Dokkum Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Brinchmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. M. Faber
Rankless by CCL
2026