G. H. Lawson
- Accounting top 5%
- Finance top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Clive W. J. GrangerOskar MorgensternDavid C. EmanuelAbdul AzizAndrew W. StarkRichard Pike
- Topics
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers)Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
G. H. Lawson
14 papers receiving 399 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Accounting 296
- Finance 261
- Economics and Econometrics 189
- Strategy and Management 91
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 66
Countries citing papers authored by G. H. Lawson
This map shows the geographic impact of G. H. Lawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. H. Lawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. H. Lawson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. H. Lawson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. H. Lawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. H. Lawson. The network helps show where G. H. Lawson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. H. Lawson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. H. Lawson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. H. Lawson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. H. Lawson. G. H. Lawson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | WILL THE PRIVATE SECTOR FUND ROADS | 1 |
| 4 | 72 | |
| 5 | 179 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Equity Values and Inflation: Dividends and Debt Financing | 13 |
| 9 | Equity Values and Inflation: a Rejoinder | 2 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Company profitability and the U.K. stock market : an exercise in cash flow accounting | 3 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Predictability of Stock Market Prices.breakdown → | 188 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Capital budgeting and the use of D.C.F. criteria in the corporation tax regime | 1 |
| 18 | 2 |
About G. H. Lawson
G. H. Lawson is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 18 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (296 citations), Finance (261 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (66 citations). G. H. Lawson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Clive W. J. Granger, Oskar Morgenstern, David C. Emanuel, Abdul Aziz, Abdul Aziz, Andrew W. Stark and Richard Pike. Their work appears in journals such as The Economic Journal, Journal of Management Studies and Management Decision.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.