James O. Horrigan
- Accounting top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Ahmad EtebariChris RobinsonGeorge M. FrankfurterMyron J. GordonElton G. McGounGeorge C. PhilippatosWillard T. Carleton
- Topics
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
James O. Horrigan
10 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Accounting 298
- Finance 215
- Strategy and Management 109
- Economics and Econometrics 73
- Artificial Intelligence 38
Countries citing papers authored by James O. Horrigan
This map shows the geographic impact of James O. Horrigan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James O. Horrigan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James O. Horrigan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James O. Horrigan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James O. Horrigan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James O. Horrigan. The network helps show where James O. Horrigan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James O. Horrigan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James O. Horrigan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James O. Horrigan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James O. Horrigan. James O. Horrigan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CVP Analysis: A New Look | 9 |
| 2 | Financial Ratio Criteria: A Hypothesis and Empirical Test | 0 |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | To Be or Not To Be ‑ Reaction of Stock Returns to Sudden Deaths of Chief Executive Officers | 1 |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | METHODOLOGICAL IMPLICATION OF NO NORMALITY DISTRIBUTED FINANCIAL RAITO: A COMMENT | 1 |
| 10 | Financial ratio analysis : an historical perspective | 8 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 303 | |
| 14 | 0 |
About James O. Horrigan
James O. Horrigan is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (298 citations), Finance (215 citations) and Strategy and Management (109 citations). James O. Horrigan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Ahmad Etebari, Chris Robinson, George M. Frankfurter, Myron J. Gordon, Elton G. McGoun, George C. Philippatos and Willard T. Carleton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Accounting Research and The Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.