David C. Emanuel

973 total citations
9 papers, 652 citations indexed

About

David C. Emanuel is a scholar working on Finance, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, David C. Emanuel has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 652 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Finance, 2 papers in Strategy and Management and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in David C. Emanuel's work include Stochastic processes and financial applications (5 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers). David C. Emanuel is often cited by papers focused on Stochastic processes and financial applications (5 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (4 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers). David C. Emanuel collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. David C. Emanuel's co-authors include James D. MacBeth, Phelim P. Boyle, G. H. Lawson, Abdul Aziz, J. Michael Harrison and Allison J. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of Financial Economics and Journal of Management Studies.

In The Last Decade

David C. Emanuel

9 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David C. Emanuel United States	8	493	226	210	77	71	9	652
Philipp Schönbucher Switzerland	13	962 2.0×	158 0.7×	301 1.4×	29 0.4×	166 2.3×	22	1.1k
Stewart D. Hodges United Kingdom	14	444 0.9×	70 0.3×	266 1.3×	71 0.9×	71 1.0×	43	581
In Joon Kim South Korea	11	855 1.7×	237 1.0×	246 1.2×	106 1.4×	43 0.6×	31	976
G. O. Bierwag United States	18	719 1.5×	148 0.7×	442 2.1×	55 0.7×	87 1.2×	47	894
Thomas S. Y. Ho United States	10	585 1.2×	182 0.8×	257 1.2×	44 0.6×	88 1.2×	20	656
San‐Lin Chung Taiwan	15	676 1.4×	116 0.5×	397 1.9×	25 0.3×	113 1.6×	53	784
George Chacko United States	13	931 1.9×	140 0.6×	456 2.2×	31 0.4×	113 1.6×	24	1.0k
Jon Gregory United Kingdom	12	481 1.0×	83 0.4×	142 0.7×	21 0.3×	72 1.0×	28	558
Jean‐Paul Décamps France	11	505 1.0×	208 0.9×	326 1.6×	68 0.9×	102 1.4×	28	640
Paul Schneider Switzerland	15	655 1.3×	83 0.4×	299 1.4×	22 0.3×	42 0.6×	48	719

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Emanuel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Emanuel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Emanuel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Emanuel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Emanuel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Emanuel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Emanuel. The network helps show where David C. Emanuel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David C. Emanuel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David C. Emanuel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David C. Emanuel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David C. Emanuel. David C. Emanuel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

MacBeth, James D., et al.. (1994). An Investment Strategy for Defined Benefit Plans. Financial Analysts Journal. 50(3). 34–41. 9 indexed citations

2.

MacBeth, James D. & David C. Emanuel. (1993). Tactical Asset Allocation: Pros and Cons. Financial Analysts Journal. 49(6). 30–43. 10 indexed citations

3.

Aziz, Abdul, David C. Emanuel, & G. H. Lawson. (1988). BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION ‐ AN INVESTIGATION OF CASH FLOW BASED MODELS^[1]. Journal of Management Studies. 25(5). 419–437. 179 indexed citations

4.

Emanuel, David C.. (1983). A Theoretical Model for Valuing Preferred Stock. The Journal of Finance. 38(4). 1133–1155. 26 indexed citations

5.

Emanuel, David C.. (1983). Warrant valuation and exercise strategy. Journal of Financial Economics. 12(2). 211–235. 54 indexed citations

6.

Emanuel, David C. & James D. MacBeth. (1982). Further Results on the Constant Elasticity of Variance Call Option Pricing Model. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 17(4). 533–533. 217 indexed citations

7.

Boyle, Phelim P. & David C. Emanuel. (1980). Discretely adjusted option hedges. Journal of Financial Economics. 8(3). 259–282. 125 indexed citations

8.

Emanuel, David C.. (1979). Extensions and developments of option pricing. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 5 indexed citations

9.

Emanuel, David C., J. Michael Harrison, & Allison J. Taylor. (1975). A diffusion approximation for the ruin function of a risk process with compounding assets. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal. 1975(4). 240–247. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact