Richard Pike

4.6k total citations
84 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Richard Pike is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Pike has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Accounting, 39 papers in Strategy and Management and 24 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Richard Pike's work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (23 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (21 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (19 papers). Richard Pike is often cited by papers focused on Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (23 papers), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (21 papers) and Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (19 papers). Richard Pike collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Canada. Richard Pike's co-authors include Musa Mangena, Roszaini Haniffa, Jing Li, Nam Sang Cheng, Jing Li, Mike Tayles, Mahfud Sholihin, Saudah Sofian, Bill Neale and Simon S. M. Ho and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management Studies, European Journal of Marketing and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Richard Pike

80 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Richard Pike United Kingdom 29 1.9k 1.9k 692 482 399 84 3.3k
Laureen A. Maines United States 22 2.3k 1.2× 1.2k 0.6× 699 1.0× 812 1.7× 314 0.8× 41 3.0k
Hervé Stolowy France 25 2.4k 1.3× 1.7k 0.9× 442 0.6× 452 0.9× 234 0.6× 87 3.2k
Gary F. Peters United States 27 4.2k 2.2× 2.2k 1.2× 556 0.8× 662 1.4× 407 1.0× 54 5.0k
Stanley Baiman United States 18 1.4k 0.7× 861 0.5× 457 0.7× 998 2.1× 533 1.3× 36 2.6k
Roger Simnett Australia 27 3.2k 1.7× 2.4k 1.3× 409 0.6× 601 1.2× 301 0.8× 96 4.4k
Avi Fiegenbaum United States 24 836 0.4× 1.7k 0.9× 316 0.5× 288 0.6× 631 1.6× 44 2.9k
Walter Aerts Belgium 22 1.5k 0.8× 1.9k 1.0× 340 0.5× 281 0.6× 320 0.8× 53 2.9k
Markku Maula Finland 29 2.0k 1.0× 1.7k 0.9× 230 0.3× 373 0.8× 932 2.3× 86 3.7k
Asghar Zardkoohi United States 23 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 0.6× 454 0.7× 134 0.3× 643 1.6× 65 2.5k
Jaideep Anand United States 30 1.2k 0.6× 2.6k 1.4× 215 0.3× 279 0.6× 916 2.3× 45 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Pike. The network helps show where Richard Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Pike. Richard Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pike, Richard, et al.. (2021). Closed Pantalar Dislocation With Checkrein Deformity: A Unique Case Report and Literature Review. JAAOS Global Research and Reviews. 5(10). 1 indexed citations
2.
Li, Jing, Musa Mangena, & Richard Pike. (2012). The Effects of Audit Committee Characteristics on Intellectual Capital Disclosures. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
3.
Mansor, Nur Naha Abu, et al.. (2012). Information usefulness and usage in business decision-making: an activity-based costing (ABC) perspective. 29(1). 19–6. 5 indexed citations
4.
Sholihin, Mahfud, Richard Pike, Musa Mangena, & Jing Li. (2011). Goal-Setting Participation and Goal Commitment: Examining the Mediating Roles of Procedural Fairness and Interpersonal Trust in a UK Financial Services Organisation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1 indexed citations
5.
Li, Jing, Richard Pike, & Roszaini Haniffa. (2008). Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research. 38(2). 137–159. 495 indexed citations
6.
Pike, Richard. (2005). Capital Investment Decision-Making: Some Results from Studying Entrepreneurial Businesses. Accounting and Business Research. 35(4). 352–353. 4 indexed citations
7.
Mangena, Musa & Richard Pike. (2005). The Effect of Audit Committee Shareholding, Financial Expertise and Size on Interim Financial Disclosures. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations
8.
Pike, Richard, Nam Sang Cheng, Karen S. Cravens, & Dawne Lamminmaki. (2005). Trade Credit Terms: Asymmetric Information and Price Discrimination Evidence from Three Continents. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
9.
Pike, Richard, Nam Sang Cheng, Karen S. Cravens, & Dawne Lamminmaki. (2005). Trade Credit Terms: Asymmetric Information and Price Discrimination Evidence From Three Continents. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 32(5-6). 1197–1236. 93 indexed citations
10.
Mangena, Musa & Richard Pike. (2004). Shareholding of audit committee members, audit committee size and expertise and the quality of interim financial reporting. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 8 indexed citations
11.
Pike, Richard, et al.. (2001). Budget Participation, Goal Interdependence and Controversy: A Study of a Chinese Public Utility. SSRN Electronic Journal.
12.
Ho, Simon S. M. & Richard Pike. (1998). ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS INFLUENCING THE USE OF RISK ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC CAPITAL INVESTMENTS. The Engineering Economist. 43(3). 247–268. 36 indexed citations
13.
Verlag, Gabler, et al.. (1997). Trade Credit Information for Export Sales: The Canadian Experience1. Management International Review. 37(3). 243. 5 indexed citations
14.
Pike, Richard & Bill Neale. (1993). Corporate Finance and Investment: Decisions and Strategies. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 100 indexed citations
15.
Butler, Richard J., et al.. (1991). STRATEGIC INVESTMENT DECISION‐MAKING: COMPLEXITIES, POLITICS AND PROCESSES*. Journal of Management Studies. 28(4). 395–415. 44 indexed citations
16.
Pike, Richard, et al.. (1990). Capital budgeting for the 1990s : a review of capital investment trends in larger companies.
17.
Pike, Richard. (1989). Do Sophisticated Capital Budgeting Approaches Improve Investment Decision-Making Effectiveness ?. The Engineering Economist. 34(2). 149–161. 38 indexed citations
18.
Pike, Richard, John Sharp, & David H. Price. (1989). AMT Investment in the Larger UK Firm. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 9(2). 13–26. 27 indexed citations
19.
Pass, Christopher & Richard Pike. (1987). Management of Working Capital: A Neglected Subject. Management Decision. 25(1). 18–24. 28 indexed citations
20.
Gaskell, George & Richard Pike. (1983). Residental energy use: An investigation of consumers and conservation strategies. Journal of Consumer Policy. 6(3). 285–302. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026