This map shows the geographic impact of G. Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Frank more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Frank. The network helps show where G. Frank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Frank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Frank.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Frank based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Frank. G. Frank is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Frank, G., et al.. (2007). History of Protected Forest Areas in Europe.. 17–40.14 indexed citations
6.
Frank, G., et al.. (2007). COST Action E27. Protected Forest Areas in Europe - analysis and harmonisation (PROFOR): results, conclusions and recommendations..16 indexed citations
7.
Frank, G., Jari Parviainen, Kris Vandekerkhove, et al.. (2007). COST Action E27. Protected Forest Areas in Europe - Analysis and Harmonisation (PROFOR): Results, Conclusions and Recommendations. Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape (BFW), Vienna, Austria.6 indexed citations
8.
Frank, G., et al.. (2007). Main results, conclusions and recommendations.. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 149–159.1 indexed citations
9.
Vandekerkhove, Kris, et al.. (2007). Classification systems used for the reporting on Protected Forest Areas (PFAs).. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 95–101.1 indexed citations
10.
Vandekerkhove, Kris, et al.. (2007). Evaluation of data derived from international classification systems: issues arising from the assessment of reported statistics. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 103–107.1 indexed citations
11.
Branquart, Étienne, et al.. (2007). Selection criteria for Protected Forest Areas dedicated to biodiversity conservation in Europe.. 51–60.4 indexed citations
12.
Karadelev, Mitko, et al.. (2005). Country report - the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.. 233–242.1 indexed citations
13.
Latham, J., et al.. (2005). Country report - Bulgaria.. 41–53.4 indexed citations
14.
Fridman, Jonas, et al.. (2005). Country report - Sweden.. 359–368.
15.
Cullotta, Sebastiano, et al.. (2005). Country report - Italy.. Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.). 187–209.3 indexed citations
16.
Latham, J., et al.. (2005). COST Action E27. Protected forest areas in Europe - analysis and harmonisation (PROFOR): Reports of signatory states..2 indexed citations
17.
Latham, J., et al.. (2005). Country report - Poland.. 273–286.1 indexed citations
Batte, Marvin T., G. Frank, Gary Schnitkey, et al.. (1995). Adoption and use of farm information systems. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.