F.W.A. Brom

1.3k total citations
59 papers, 759 citations indexed

About

F.W.A. Brom is a scholar working on Small Animals, Sociology and Political Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, F.W.A. Brom has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 759 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Small Animals, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 9 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in F.W.A. Brom's work include Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). F.W.A. Brom is often cited by papers focused on Animal testing and alternatives (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). F.W.A. Brom collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. F.W.A. Brom's co-authors include F.L.B. Meijboom, B.G. Meerburg, Aize Kijlstra, Bernice Bovenkerk, V. Beekman, E.N. Stassen, E.D. Ellen, K.A. Uitdehaag, L. Star and L. A. Dobrzański and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Pest Management Science and Technology in Society.

In The Last Decade

F.W.A. Brom

56 papers receiving 668 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F.W.A. Brom Netherlands	14	168	164	148	133	114	59	759
Bart Gremmen Netherlands	17	180 1.1×	74 0.5×	87 0.6×	105 0.8×	121 1.1×	56	902
Mickey Gjerris Denmark	15	96 0.6×	150 0.9×	110 0.7×	149 1.1×	63 0.6×	48	715
Kate Millar United Kingdom	18	100 0.6×	253 1.5×	272 1.8×	77 0.6×	119 1.0×	41	887
Cees van Woerkum Netherlands	16	152 0.9×	155 0.9×	230 1.6×	132 1.0×	215 1.9×	45	1.2k
Melanie Connor United Kingdom	19	201 1.2×	258 1.6×	182 1.2×	72 0.5×	200 1.8×	43	954
Pierre Sans France	14	137 0.8×	95 0.6×	160 1.1×	367 2.8×	48 0.4×	44	983
Helena Röcklinsberg Sweden	18	165 1.0×	305 1.9×	373 2.5×	243 1.8×	37 0.3×	51	972
Christopher Bear United Kingdom	21	266 1.6×	226 1.4×	78 0.5×	241 1.8×	206 1.8×	29	1.2k
Michiel Korthals Netherlands	13	140 0.8×	69 0.4×	32 0.2×	108 0.8×	126 1.1×	55	637
Jens Oliver Kügler Denmark	9	182 1.1×	54 0.3×	96 0.6×	160 1.2×	47 0.4×	14	684

Countries citing papers authored by F.W.A. Brom

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.W.A. Brom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.W.A. Brom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.W.A. Brom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.W.A. Brom

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.W.A. Brom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.W.A. Brom. The network helps show where F.W.A. Brom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.W.A. Brom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.W.A. Brom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.W.A. Brom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F.W.A. Brom. F.W.A. Brom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Brom, F.W.A., et al.. (2022). Coronavirus disease 2019 scenarios for a long-term strategy under fundamental uncertainty. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 148. 196–199. 3 indexed citations

Brom, F.W.A.. (2020). For the humanities to play a stronger role in public policy making, they must move from individual to institutional engagement. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

Brom, F.W.A., et al.. (2015). Working on the robot society : Visions and insights from science concerning the relationship between technology and employment. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 3 indexed citations

Brom, F.W.A., et al.. (2014). Broadening the debate on shale gas : guidelines for decision-making based on the Dutch experience. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations

Brom, F.W.A., et al.. (2013). The dynamics of citizen deliberation regarding human enhancement in the Netherlands.. 143–161. 6 indexed citations

Asveld, Lotte, Dirk Stemerding, & F.W.A. Brom. (2009). Bio-based economy. 4 indexed citations

Brom, F.W.A., et al.. (2009). Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment: An Empirical Model to Describe Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment on the Culling of Healthy Animals During an Animal Disease Epidemic. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 22(4). 341–359. 21 indexed citations

Dobrzański, L. A. & F.W.A. Brom. (2008). E-learning on the example of materials science. Journal of Achievements of Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 29. 99–102. 8 indexed citations

Dobrzański, L. A. & F.W.A. Brom. (2008). The assessment of teaching materials science subjects using e-learning method. Journal of Achievements of Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 30. 204–210. 4 indexed citations

10.

Dobrzański, L. A. & F.W.A. Brom. (2008). Blended learning in teaching materials science subjects at full time studies. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering. 34. 57–60. 2 indexed citations

11.

Meerburg, B.G., F.W.A. Brom, & Aize Kijlstra. (2008). The ethics of rodent control. Pest Management Science. 64(12). 1205–1211. 51 indexed citations

12.

Dobrzański, L. A., et al.. (2007). Use of e-learning in teaching fundamentals of materials science. Journal of Achievements of Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 24. 215–218. 10 indexed citations

13.

Dobrzański, L. A., et al.. (2007). Teaching of material science matters using e-learning techniques. Archives of Materials Science and Engineering. 28(1). 691–694. 2 indexed citations

14.

Bovenkerk, Bernice, et al.. (2002). Brave New Birds. The Hastings Center Report. 32(1). 6 indexed citations

15.

Brom, F.W.A.. (2002). Science and society: different bioethical approaches towards animal experimentation.. PubMed. 19(2). 78–82. 12 indexed citations

16.

Bovenkerk, Bernice, et al.. (2002). Brave New Birds: The Use of 'Animal Integrity' in Animal Ethics. The Hastings Center Report. 32(1). 16–16. 47 indexed citations

17.

Burg, Wibren van der & F.W.A. Brom. (2000). Legislation on ethical issues: towards an interactive paradigm.. PubMed. 3(1). 57–75. 12 indexed citations

18.

Verweij, Marcel, et al.. (2000). Do's and Dont's for Ethics Committees: Practical Lessons Learned in the Netherlands. HEC Forum. 12(4). 344–357. 7 indexed citations

19.

Beekman, V. & F.W.A. Brom. (1999). Preprints First European Congress on Agricultural and Food Ethics. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.

20.

Boer, I.J.M. de, et al.. (1995). An ethical evaluation of animal biotechnology: the case of using clones in dairy cattle breeding. Animal Science. 61(3). 453–463. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact