E.N. Stassen
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 16
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology 13
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 4
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 6
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 4
-
- Agriculture and Farm Safety 6
-
- Zoonotic diseases and public health 5
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Co-authors
- H. HogeveenM.R.N. BruijnisBart GremmenChris GarforthB. BeerdaVincent BlokJ.P.T.M. NoordhuizenF.W.A. Brom
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumCosta Rica
In The Last Decade
E.N. Stassen
33 papers receiving 995 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Small Animals 620
- Agronomy and Crop Science 405
- Animal Science and Zoology 344
- Genetics 256
- Business and International Management 13
Countries citing papers authored by E.N. Stassen
This map shows the geographic impact of E.N. Stassen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.N. Stassen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.N. Stassen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.N. Stassen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.N. Stassen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.N. Stassen. The network helps show where E.N. Stassen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.N. Stassen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 6 | Ecology and distribution of Thanasimus formicarius (Linnaeus, 1758) and the newly discovered Thanasimus femoralis (Zetterstedt, 1828) in Belgium (Coleoptera: Cleridae) | 2017 | 8 |
| 7 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 76 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 113 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 202 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 77 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 54 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 20 | Decision making on disease occurrence in herd health and production management programs. | 1991 | 1 |
About E.N. Stassen
E.N. Stassen is a scholar working on Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Business and International Management, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (13 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (6 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (620 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (405 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (344 citations). E.N. Stassen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include H. Hogeveen, M.R.N. Bruijnis, Bart Gremmen, Chris Garforth, B. Beerda, Vincent Blok, J.P.T.M. Noordhuizen, F.W.A. Brom, F.L.B. Meijboom and A. Bouma. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Dairy Science and Poultry Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.