Ethics Place & Environment

259 papers and 3.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 259 papers published in Ethics Place & Environment in the last decades have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethics Place & Environment usually cover Sociology and Political Science (104 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (71 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (52 papers) specifically the topics of Geographies of human-animal interactions (57 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (51 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethics Place & Environment are A. Lawrence, Mark Davidson, Gill Valentine, María Puig de la Bellacasa, Kersty Hobson, Paul R. Mullins, Kim England, John Silk, Michael K. Goodman and Cheryl McEwan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ethics Place & Environment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethics Place & Environment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethics Place & Environment.

Countries where authors publish in Ethics Place & Environment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethics Place & Environment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethics Place & Environment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethics Place & Environment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025