Friedrich Borchers
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 1%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Claudia SpiesInsa FeinkohlGeorg WintererWolf‐Rüdiger BrockhausTobias PischonGunnar LachmannThomas H. OttensSophie K. Piper
- Topics
- Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (21 papers)Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (16 papers)Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuropsychologia
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsDenmark
In The Last Decade
Friedrich Borchers
27 papers receiving 439 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 281
- Developmental Neuroscience 187
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 131
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 118
- Psychiatry and Mental health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Friedrich Borchers
This map shows the geographic impact of Friedrich Borchers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friedrich Borchers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friedrich Borchers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friedrich Borchers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friedrich Borchers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friedrich Borchers. The network helps show where Friedrich Borchers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friedrich Borchers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friedrich Borchers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friedrich Borchers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friedrich Borchers. Friedrich Borchers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 72 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About Friedrich Borchers
Friedrich Borchers is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (21 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (16 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (281 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (187 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (118 citations). Friedrich Borchers has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Claudia Spies, Insa Feinkohl, Georg Winterer, Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus, Tobias Pischon, Gunnar Lachmann, Thomas H. Ottens, Sophie K. Piper, Norman Zacharias and Finn M. Radtke. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Neuropsychologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.