Anne-Mette C. Sauër
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 1%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Diederik van DijkCor J. KalkmanDieuwke S. VeldhuijzenThomas H. OttensArjen J. C. SlooterHendrik M. NathoeJan M. DielemanJohn W. Devlin
- Topics
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers)Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers)Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsDenmarkGermany
In The Last Decade
Anne-Mette C. Sauër
10 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 295
- Developmental Neuroscience 233
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 188
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 109
- Surgery 41
Countries citing papers authored by Anne-Mette C. Sauër
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne-Mette C. Sauër's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne-Mette C. Sauër with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne-Mette C. Sauër more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne-Mette C. Sauër
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne-Mette C. Sauër. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne-Mette C. Sauër. The network helps show where Anne-Mette C. Sauër may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne-Mette C. Sauër
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne-Mette C. Sauër. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne-Mette C. Sauër based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne-Mette C. Sauër. Anne-Mette C. Sauër is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 73 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | 74 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 14 |
About Anne-Mette C. Sauër
Anne-Mette C. Sauër is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 10 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (295 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (233 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (109 citations). Anne-Mette C. Sauër has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Diederik van Dijk, Cor J. Kalkman, Dieuwke S. Veldhuijzen, Thomas H. Ottens, Arjen J. C. Slooter, Hendrik M. Nathoe, Jan M. Dieleman, John W. Devlin, Maarten M. J. van Eijk and Linda M. Peelen. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia and The Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.