Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus

463 total citations
7 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 5 papers in Developmental Neuroscience and 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus's work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (5 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus is often cited by papers focused on Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (5 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers). Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Netherlands. Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus's co-authors include Claudia Spies, Andreas Heinz, Torsten Wüstenberg, Robert C. Lorenz, Norbert Kathmann, Michael A. Rapp, Stephan Heinzel, Friedrich Borchers, Finn M. Radtke and Sophie K. Piper and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

In The Last Decade

Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus

7 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus Germany 7 153 120 91 91 57 7 308
Christina E. Webb United States 12 210 1.4× 166 1.4× 104 1.1× 184 2.0× 57 1.0× 16 518
Friedrich Borchers Germany 14 281 1.8× 187 1.6× 131 1.4× 43 0.5× 118 2.1× 31 445
Simone J.T. van Montfort Netherlands 12 186 1.2× 103 0.9× 37 0.4× 69 0.8× 103 1.8× 17 386
Reine Ibala United States 11 161 1.1× 107 0.9× 25 0.3× 112 1.2× 144 2.5× 16 328
Robert Jan Osse Netherlands 9 211 1.4× 121 1.0× 71 0.8× 29 0.3× 142 2.5× 15 351
Vera Guttenthaler Germany 11 110 0.7× 77 0.6× 38 0.4× 43 0.5× 52 0.9× 16 304
Lynda Wells United States 16 63 0.4× 106 0.9× 72 0.8× 37 0.4× 190 3.3× 23 568
Hannah Maybrier United States 10 334 2.2× 246 2.0× 114 1.3× 71 0.8× 316 5.5× 16 469
MeeLee Tom United States 6 70 0.5× 75 0.6× 34 0.4× 246 2.7× 142 2.5× 6 408
Ravishankar Nagaraj India 4 156 1.0× 122 1.0× 79 0.9× 99 1.1× 29 0.5× 5 370

Countries citing papers authored by Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus. The network helps show where Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus. Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Borchers, Friedrich, Claudia Spies, Insa Feinkohl, et al.. (2021). Methodology of measuring postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a systematic review. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 126(6). 1119–1127. 72 indexed citations
2.
Spies, Claudia, Cornelia Knaak, Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus, et al.. (2021). Physostigmine for prevention of postoperative delirium and long-term cognitive dysfunction in liver surgery. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 38(9). 943–956. 22 indexed citations
3.
Knaak, Cornelia, Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus, Claudia Spies, et al.. (2020). Presurgical cognitive impairment is associated with postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Minerva Anestesiologica. 86(4). 394–403. 18 indexed citations
4.
Knaak, Cornelia, Gerald Vorderwülbecke, Claudia Spies, et al.. (2019). C‐reactive protein for risk prediction of post‐operative delirium and post‐operative neurocognitive disorder. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 63(10). 1282–1289. 22 indexed citations
5.
Feinkohl, Insa, Gunnar Lachmann, Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus, et al.. (2018). Association of obesity, diabetes and hypertension with cognitive impairment in older age. Clinical Epidemiology. Volume 10. 853–862. 38 indexed citations
6.
Franck, Martin, Bruno Neuner, Peter Schlattmann, et al.. (2016). No convincing association between post‐operative delirium and post‐operative cognitive dysfunction: a secondary analysis. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 60(10). 1404–1414. 29 indexed citations
7.
Heinzel, Stephan, Robert C. Lorenz, Wolf‐Rüdiger Brockhaus, et al.. (2014). Working Memory Load-Dependent Brain Response Predicts Behavioral Training Gains in Older Adults. Journal of Neuroscience. 34(4). 1224–1233. 107 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026