Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
General System Theory: Applications for Organization and Management.
1972362 citationsFremont E. Kast et al.Academy of Management Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Fremont E. Kast
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Fremont E. Kast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fremont E. Kast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fremont E. Kast more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fremont E. Kast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fremont E. Kast. The network helps show where Fremont E. Kast may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fremont E. Kast
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fremont E. Kast.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fremont E. Kast based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fremont E. Kast. Fremont E. Kast is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kast, Fremont E. & James E. Rosenzweig. (1993). Administración en las organizaciones: enfoque de sistemas y de contingencias. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa). 754–754.32 indexed citations
2.
Kast, Fremont E. & James E. Rosenzweig. (1992). System Concepts: Pervasiveness and Potential. Management International Review. 32. 40.4 indexed citations
3.
Kast, Fremont E.. (1983). Changing the University. Contemporary Psychology. 28(2). 132–133.1 indexed citations
4.
Kast, Fremont E. & James E. Rosenzweig. (1981). General systems theory: applications for organization and management.. PubMed. 11(7). 32–41.66 indexed citations
Kast, Fremont E. & James E. Rosenzweig. (1976). Experiential exercises and cases in management. Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).2 indexed citations
7.
Kast, Fremont E. & James E. Rosenzweig. (1974). Organization and Management: A Systems Approach. Medical Entomology and Zoology.133 indexed citations
8.
Kast, Fremont E., et al.. (1972). General System Theory: Applications for Organization and Management.. Academy of Management Journal. 15(4). 447–465.362 indexed citations breakdown →
Johnson, Richard A., Fremont E. Kast, & James E. Rosenzweig. (1964). Systems Theory and Management. Management Science. 10(2). 367–384.71 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, Richard A., Fremont E. Kast, & James E. Rosenzweig. (1963). The Theory and Management of Systems. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 58(303). 870–870.89 indexed citations
17.
Kast, Fremont E. & James E. Rosenzweig. (1962). Management in the space age : an analysis of the concept of weapon system management and its non-military applications.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.