Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns1
2017560 citationsFredrik Svahn, Lars Mathiassen et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Fredrik Svahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredrik Svahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredrik Svahn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredrik Svahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredrik Svahn. The network helps show where Fredrik Svahn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fredrik Svahn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fredrik Svahn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fredrik Svahn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fredrik Svahn. Fredrik Svahn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Svahn, Fredrik, et al.. (2020). Becoming a Digital Ecosystem Orchestrator - The Sydved Case. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.6 indexed citations
Svahn, Fredrik, et al.. (2016). Shifting Design Capability to Third-Party Developers: An affordance Perspective on Platform Boundary Resources. Americas Conference on Information Systems.4 indexed citations
6.
Svahn, Fredrik, et al.. (2016). TRANSFORMING ORGANIZATIONAL RESOURCE INTO PLATFORM BOUNDARY RESOURCES. European Conference on Information Systems.7 indexed citations
7.
Svahn, Fredrik, et al.. (2015). Resource Transformation in Platform Envelopment. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Selander, Lisen, Ola Henfridsson, & Fredrik Svahn. (2010). TRANSFORMING ECOSYSTEM RELATIONSHIPS IN DIGITAL INNOVATION. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 138.43 indexed citations
14.
Svahn, Fredrik, Ola Henfridsson, & Youngjin Yoo. (2009). A Threesome Dance of Agency : Mangling the Sociomateriality of Technological Regimes in Digital Innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 5.35 indexed citations
15.
Henfridsson, Ola, Youngjin Yoo, & Fredrik Svahn. (2009). Path Creation in Digital Innovation: A Multi-Layered Dialectics Perspective. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 9(20).29 indexed citations
Henfridsson, Ola, Lars Mathiassen, & Fredrik Svahn. (2009). Reconfiguring Modularity: Closing Capability Gaps in Digital Innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 9(22).13 indexed citations
Svahn, Fredrik. (2004). In-car navigation usage: An end-user survey on existing systems. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology).6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.