Raimo Tuomela
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 11
- Philosophy 22
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 17
Raimo Tuomela
91 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- History and Philosophy of Science 458
- Philosophy 827
- Cognitive Neuroscience 670
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 427
- General Decision Sciences 49
Countries citing papers authored by Raimo Tuomela
This map shows the geographic impact of Raimo Tuomela's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raimo Tuomela with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raimo Tuomela more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raimo Tuomela
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raimo Tuomela. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raimo Tuomela. The network helps show where Raimo Tuomela may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Raimo Tuomela, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 3 | Neural Correlates Underlying Action-intention and Aim-intention | 2005 | 2 |
| 4 | 2003 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 9 | Philosophy and distributed artificial intelligence: the case of joint intention | 1996 | 2 |
| 10 | The social dimension of action theory | 1991 | 2 |
| 11 | 1989 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 63 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 18 | |
| 16 | The Logic and epistemology of scientific change | 1979 | 41 |
| 17 | Neue Versuche über Erklären und Verstehen | 1978 | 5 |
| 18 | 1978 | 23 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 36 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 2 |
About Raimo Tuomela
Raimo Tuomela is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Safety Research, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (458 citations), Philosophy (827 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (670 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (427 citations) and General Decision Sciences (49 citations). Raimo Tuomela has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kaarlo Miller, Ilkka Niiniluoto, Harold Kincaid, Raul Hakli, Wolfgang Balzer, Robert Ackermann, Myles Brand, Gabriel Sandu, Pekka Mäkelä and Karl‐Otto Apel. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Erkenntnis, Analyse & Kritik and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.