Frédéric Nana
Impact in
- Toxicology top 10%
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
Papers in
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
- Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies 3
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 5
- Bioactive natural compounds 3
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 2
- Co-authors
- Victor Kuete (9 shared papers)Bonaventure T. Ngadjui (5 shared papers)Félix Keumedjio (4 shared papers)Armelle T. Mbaveng (1 shared paper)Bathélémy Ngameni (2 shared papers)Gilbert Kirsch (8 shared papers)Moheddine Askri (2 shared papers)Dharmarajan Sriram (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Frédéric Nana
17 papers receiving 330 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Toxicology 23
- Drug Discovery 1
- Pharmacology 36
- Food Science 76
- Forestry 17
Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Nana
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Nana's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Nana with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Nana more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Nana
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Nana. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Nana. The network helps show where Frédéric Nana may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Nana, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 16 | Two new iridoid glycosides from Morinda morindoides (Rubiaceae) | 2017 | 1 |
| 17 | 2016 | 1 |
About Frédéric Nana
Frédéric Nana is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Forestry and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (5 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (3 papers), Bioactive natural compounds (3 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (3 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (2 papers) and Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (23 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation), Pharmacology (36 citations), Food Science (76 citations) and Forestry (17 citations). Frédéric Nana has collaborated with scholars based in France, Cameroon and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Victor Kuete, Bonaventure T. Ngadjui, Félix Keumedjio, Armelle T. Mbaveng, Bathélémy Ngameni, Gilbert Kirsch, Moheddine Askri, Dharmarajan Sriram, Perumal Yogeeswari and Louis P. Sandjo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Phytochemistry Letters, Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine and Planta Medica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.