Helvetica Chimica Acta

17.3k papers and 315.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 17.3k papers published in Helvetica Chimica Acta in the last decades have received a total of 315.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Helvetica Chimica Acta usually cover Organic Chemistry (10.0k papers), Molecular Biology (5.9k papers) and Spectroscopy (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (1.7k papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (1.4k papers) and Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Helvetica Chimica Acta are Dieter Seebàch, Andrea Vasella, Ervin sz. Kováts, E. Heilbronner, G. Anderegg, H. Schmid, G. Schwarzenbach, Heinz Heimgartner, T. Reichstein and Albert Eschenmoser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Helvetica Chimica Acta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Helvetica Chimica Acta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Helvetica Chimica Acta.

Countries where authors publish in Helvetica Chimica Acta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Helvetica Chimica Acta. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Helvetica Chimica Acta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helvetica Chimica Acta more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025