Fred Johnson

498 citations
17 papers · 285 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Johnson

11 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Fred Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Philosophy 51
  • Literature and Literary Theory 48
  • Language and Linguistics 33
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 31
  • Education 63
Replace Jane A. Nicholson with:
Jane A. Nicholson United Kingdom
Malcolm O. Sillars United States
David Godden United States
James B. Freeman United States
Peter Barry United States
Jim Mackenzie Australia
Frederick L. Will United States
Jan Albert van Laar Netherlands
Myron Tuman United States
Maurizio Ferraris Italy
Fred Johnson relative to Jane A. Nicholson United Kingdom Jane A. Nicholson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Jane A. Nicholson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Johnson. The network helps show where Fred Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Fred Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Fred Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1980237
2 198920
3
A three-valued interpretation for a relevance logic
19767
4 19916
5 19895
6 19783
7 19842
8 20052
9 19971
10 19991
11 19941
12
Recruiting, Retaining and Advancing Minority Employees.
19720
13 20250
14 19930
15 19760
16 19780
17 20120

About Fred Johnson

Fred Johnson is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (2 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Semantic Web and Ontologies (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper) and Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (51 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations), Language and Linguistics (33 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (31 citations) and Education (63 citations). Fred Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerald S. Hanna, Alan P. Koretsky, Laxmi Iyer and Patrick M. Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophical Logic, Informal Logic, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Studia Logica and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact