R. M. Hare

7.8k citations
81 papers · 3.0k indexed · 4 hit papers · h-index 20

R. M. Hare

72 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point3871963202619842005200400600

Peers

R. M. Hare
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Philosophy 1.3k
  • General Decision Sciences 135
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 888
  • Information Systems and Management 193
  • History and Philosophy of Science 113
Replace Robert Nozick with:
Robert Nozick United States
Judith Jarvis Thomson United States
Fred Feldman United States
Samuel Scheffler United States
Robert Audi United States
Harry G. Frankfurt United States
Michael Slote United States
Thomas Scanlon United States
Peter Railton United States
Stephen Darwall United States
R. M. Hare relative to Robert Nozick United States Robert Nozick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robert Nozick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. M. Hare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. Hare's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. Hare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. Hare more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. M. Hare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. Hare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. Hare. The network helps show where R. M. Hare may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. M. Hare, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. M. Hare Line = papers co-authored together R. M. Hare links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Subjugation and Bondage: Critical Essays on Slavery and Social Philosophy
199812
2
Philosophie et conflit
19940
3 199026
4 19890
5 19899
6 19891
7 19865
8 198420
9 19832
10
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Pointbreakdown →
1982387
11
What is wrong with slavery
197921
12 1979113
13 19782
14 19741
15 197427
16 197219
17
Symposium: Pain and Evil
19643
18 196216
19 19592
20 19573

About R. M. Hare

R. M. Hare is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Law, having authored 81 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (11 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (4 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.3k citations), General Decision Sciences (135 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (888 citations), Information Systems and Management (193 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (113 citations). R. M. Hare has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include John Rawls, Francis Sparshott, Bernard Mayo, Nick Fotion, Martin Malia, Marcus G. Singer, Stephen Toulmin, Patrick Gardiner, Stuart Hampshire and George Sher. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, The Slavic and East European Journal, Mind, Bioethics and Theoria.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026