Fraser Milton

2.2k total citations
53 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Fraser Milton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Fraser Milton has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 27 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Fraser Milton's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (22 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). Fraser Milton is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (22 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (12 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers). Fraser Milton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Fraser Milton's co-authors include Adam Zeman, Andy J. Wills, Crawford Winlove, Christopher Butler, Nils Muhlert, Jonathan Fulford, Matthew MacKisack, Narinder Kapur, Abdelmalek Benattayallah and Alicia Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Brain and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Fraser Milton

52 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fraser Milton United Kingdom 20 828 373 310 216 159 53 1.3k
Mandy J. Maguire United States 24 962 1.2× 531 1.4× 314 1.0× 117 0.5× 138 0.9× 60 1.5k
Toni Cunillera Spain 22 1.2k 1.5× 496 1.3× 285 0.9× 167 0.8× 101 0.6× 36 1.6k
Andrea Stocco United States 19 1.2k 1.4× 287 0.8× 208 0.7× 101 0.5× 121 0.8× 74 1.6k
Evan J. Livesey Australia 18 860 1.0× 404 1.1× 192 0.6× 70 0.3× 130 0.8× 96 1.2k
Arnaud Destrebecqz Belgium 19 1.3k 1.6× 574 1.5× 273 0.9× 71 0.3× 299 1.9× 46 1.7k
Dagmar Zeithamová United States 21 1.6k 1.9× 624 1.7× 242 0.8× 67 0.3× 161 1.0× 44 1.9k
James K. Kroger United States 11 1.3k 1.6× 327 0.9× 457 1.5× 82 0.4× 204 1.3× 17 1.7k
E. E. SMITH United States 9 1.2k 1.4× 266 0.7× 249 0.8× 177 0.8× 138 0.9× 17 1.5k
Margaret M. Keane United States 28 2.3k 2.8× 682 1.8× 372 1.2× 374 1.7× 241 1.5× 53 2.6k
Katherine Woollett United Kingdom 9 635 0.8× 127 0.3× 179 0.6× 108 0.5× 126 0.8× 9 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser Milton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser Milton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser Milton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser Milton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser Milton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser Milton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser Milton. The network helps show where Fraser Milton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fraser Milton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fraser Milton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fraser Milton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fraser Milton. Fraser Milton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Milton, Fraser, Jonathan Fulford, Carla Dance, et al.. (2021). Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia. Cerebral Cortex Communications. 2(2). tgab035–tgab035. 120 indexed citations
2.
Zeman, Adam, Fraser Milton, Sergio Della Sala, et al.. (2020). Phantasia–The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex. 130. 426–440. 152 indexed citations
3.
Wills, Andy J., et al.. (2020). A dimensional summation account of polymorphous category learning. Learning & Behavior. 48(1). 66–83. 4 indexed citations
4.
Liu, Xin, Rossy McLaren, Heike Elchlepp, et al.. (2019). The effect of tDCS on recognition depends on stimulus generalization: Neuro-stimulation can predictably enhance or reduce the face inversion effect.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition. 46(1). 83–98. 9 indexed citations
5.
Fulford, Jonathan, et al.. (2017). The neural correlates of visual imagery vividness – An fMRI study and literature review. Cortex. 105. 26–40. 120 indexed citations
6.
Savage, Sharon, et al.. (2017). The evolution of accelerated long-term forgetting: Evidence from the TIME study. Cortex. 110. 16–36. 13 indexed citations
7.
Wills, Andy J., et al.. (2016). Memory for exemplars in category learning.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations
8.
Savage, Sharon, Christopher Butler, Fraser Milton, Yang Han, & Adam Zeman. (2016). On the nose: Olfactory disturbances in patients with transient epileptic amnesia. Epilepsy & Behavior. 66. 113–119. 14 indexed citations
10.
Milton, Fraser, et al.. (2014). The effect of pre-exposure on family resemblance categorization for stimuli of varying levels of perceptual difficulty. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 2 indexed citations
11.
Zeman, Adam, Fraser Milton, Alicia Smith, & Rick Rylance. (2013). By heart: An fMRI study of brain activation by poetry and prose.. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 20. 31 indexed citations
12.
Wills, Andy J., et al.. (2013). Impulsivity and Overall Similarity Classification. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 1 indexed citations
13.
Milton, Fraser, et al.. (2012). Differences in eye movements between same and other race face recognition.. Cognitive Science. 34(34). 3 indexed citations
14.
Zeman, Adam, Christopher Butler, Nils Muhlert, & Fraser Milton. (2012). Novel forms of forgetting in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior. 26(3). 335–342. 32 indexed citations
15.
Milton, Fraser, Christopher Butler, Abdelmalek Benattayallah, & Adam Zeman. (2012). The neural basis of autobiographical memory deficits in transient epileptic amnesia. Neuropsychologia. 50(14). 3528–3541. 21 indexed citations
16.
Milton, Fraser, et al.. (2011). The effect of time pressure and the spatial integration of the stimulus dimensions on overall similarity categorization.. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 5 indexed citations
17.
Milton, Fraser, Nils Muhlert, Christopher Butler, et al.. (2011). An fMRI study of long-term everyday memory using SenseCam. Memory. 19(7). 733–744. 43 indexed citations
18.
Goto, Kazuhiro, Stephen E. G. Lea, Andy J. Wills, & Fraser Milton. (2011). Interpreting the effects of image manipulation on picture perception in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).. Journal of comparative psychology. 125(1). 48–60. 5 indexed citations
19.
Milton, Fraser, Christopher A. Longmore, & Andy J. Wills. (2008). Processes of overall similarity sorting in free classification.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 34(3). 676–692. 43 indexed citations
20.
Longmore, Christopher A., Fraser Milton, & Andy J. Wills. (2007). Free Classification: Evidence for an Analytic System of Overall Similarity Sorting. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 29(29). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026