Francisco Gil-White
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Safety Research top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Joseph HenrichRichard McElreathHerbert GintisJean EnsmingerMichael AlvardKim HillNatalie HenrichErnst Fehr
- Topics
- Language and cultural evolution (7 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandMexico
In The Last Decade
Francisco Gil-White
12 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
- Social Psychology 1.0k
- Safety Research 767
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 697
- Cognitive Neuroscience 511
Countries citing papers authored by Francisco Gil-White
This map shows the geographic impact of Francisco Gil-White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francisco Gil-White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francisco Gil-White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Francisco Gil-White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francisco Gil-White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francisco Gil-White. The network helps show where Francisco Gil-White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francisco Gil-White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francisco Gil-White. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francisco Gil-White based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francisco Gil-White. Francisco Gil-White is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The study of ethnicity and nationalism needs better categories | 2 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societiesbreakdown → | 1089 |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | The evolution of prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmissionbreakdown → | 1469 |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 266 | |
| 15 | 99 |
About Francisco Gil-White
Francisco Gil-White is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Demography and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language and cultural evolution (7 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (7 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (767 citations), General Decision Sciences (100 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (697 citations). Francisco Gil-White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Henrich, Richard McElreath, Herbert Gintis, Jean Ensminger, Michael Alvard, Kim Hill, Natalie Henrich, Ernst Fehr, Colin F. Camerer and Abigail Barr. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Current Anthropology and Evolution and Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.