Frances E. Anderson

400 citations
39 papers · 263 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Frances E. Anderson

30 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Frances E. Anderson
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Conservation 123
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 86
  • Clinical Psychology 77
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Music 10
Replace Edith Kramer with:
Edith Kramer United States
Gioia Chilton United States
David Lomas United Kingdom
Suzanne Haeyen Netherlands
Henk Smeijsters Netherlands
Nicola J. Holt United Kingdom
Carine Lewis United Kingdom
Peter Felsman United States
Zygmunt A. Piotrowski United States
Jill Green United States
Frances E. Anderson relative to Edith Kramer United States Edith Kramer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Edith Kramer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frances E. Anderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances E. Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances E. Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances E. Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances E. Anderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances E. Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances E. Anderson. The network helps show where Frances E. Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Frances E. Anderson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frances E. Anderson Line = papers co-authored together Frances E. Anderson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200954
2 201146
3 199526
4
Art-Centered Education and Therapy for Children With Disabilities
199621
5
Art for all the children : a creative sourcebook for the impaired child
197812
6 200112
7 19719
8 19839
9 20018
10 19948
11 19857
12 19865
13 19744
14
Opening Pandora's Box--Issues in Definition: Art Education/Art Therapy.
19763
15 19693
16 19803
17 19913
18 19693
19 19793
20 19843

About Frances E. Anderson

Frances E. Anderson is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Conservation, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Urban Studies, having authored 39 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Education and Development (16 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (13 papers), Child Therapy and Development (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers), Digital Media and Visual Art (3 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers) and Color perception and design (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (123 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (86 citations), Clinical Psychology (77 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Music (10 citations). Frances E. Anderson has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Linda Gantt, Paolo Legrenzi, Carlo Umiltà, Sandra Packard, William M. Stallings and Edith Kramer. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Art Education, Art Therapy, Art Education, Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation and Program Planning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact