Flis Henwood
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Angie HartSally WyattJulie SmithBenjamin MarentMary DarkingRoma HarrisPhilippa SpoelMarian Barnes
- Topics
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (12 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers)Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Flis Henwood
62 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- General Health Professions 673
- Sociology and Political Science 381
- Gender Studies 193
- Health 173
- Education 129
Countries citing papers authored by Flis Henwood
This map shows the geographic impact of Flis Henwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flis Henwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flis Henwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Flis Henwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flis Henwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flis Henwood. The network helps show where Flis Henwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Flis Henwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Flis Henwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Flis Henwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Flis Henwood. Flis Henwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 61 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Participatory Design in a Technology Resistant Domain | 1 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | Research into EPRs: how midwives really feel. | 3 |
| 15 | 158 | |
| 16 | De digitale tweedeling: Internet, gezondheidsinformatie en het dagelijks leven | 1 |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | Turned on or turned off?: accessing health information on the internet | 13 |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | Establishing gender perspectives on information technology: problems, issues and opportunities | 45 |
About Flis Henwood
Flis Henwood is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (12 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (673 citations), Medical Terminology (6 citations) and Gender Studies (193 citations). Flis Henwood has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Angie Hart, Sally Wyatt, Julie Smith, Benjamin Marent, Mary Darking, Roma Harris, Philippa Spoel, Marian Barnes, Valerie Hall and Catherine Will. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Advanced Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.