Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Connections, new ways of working in the networked organization
This map shows the geographic impact of Sally Wyatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sally Wyatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sally Wyatt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sally Wyatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sally Wyatt. The network helps show where Sally Wyatt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sally Wyatt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sally Wyatt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sally Wyatt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sally Wyatt. Sally Wyatt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cousijn, Helena, et al.. (2018). Understanding Data Retrieval Practices: A Social Informatics Perspective. arXiv (Cornell University).5 indexed citations
8.
Boulton, Geoffrey, Simon Hodson, Jianhui Li, et al.. (2017). Datos abiertos en un mundo de grandes datos. Un acuerdo internacional ICSU-IAP-ISSC-TWAS. E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II).2 indexed citations
9.
Wyatt, Sally, et al.. (2016). The Intellectual and Practical Contributions of Scientometrics to STS. Science & Technology Studies. 87–112.11 indexed citations
10.
Wouters, Paul, Anne Beaulieu, Andrea Scharnhorst, & Sally Wyatt. (2013). Virtual Knowledge. Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).21 indexed citations
11.
Meyer, Eric T., Monica Bulger, Peter Williams, et al.. (2011). Collaborative Yet Independent: Information Practices in the Physical Sciences. CERN Bulletin.5 indexed citations
12.
Wyatt, Sally. (2008). Challenging the digital imperative. Inaugural Lecture.. Research Publications (Maastricht University).1 indexed citations
Wathen, C. Nadine, Sally Wyatt, & Roma Harris. (2008). Mediating health information : the go-betweens in a changing socio-technical landscape. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).24 indexed citations
15.
Doorn, Niels van, Sally Wyatt, & Liesbet van Zoonen. (2008). A Body of Text. Feminist Media Studies. 8(4). 357–374.7 indexed citations
16.
Wyatt, Sally, Flis Henwood, Angie Hart, & Julie Smith. (2003). De digitale tweedeling: Internet, gezondheidsinformatie en het dagelijks leven. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 30. 254–273.1 indexed citations
17.
Henwood, Flis, Sally Wyatt, Angie Hart, & Julie Smith. (2002). Turned on or turned off?: accessing health information on the internet. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 14(2). 79–90.13 indexed citations
Wyatt, Sally. (1992). Tijdsregistratie bij huishoudelijk werk: winst en verlies bij vrouwen. Mens en Maatschappij. 67(2). 106–127.1 indexed citations
20.
Wyatt, Sally. (1990). Understanding IT innovation in public services. 12(1). 3–8.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.