Fleur van Rens

23 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers

Fleur van Rens
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 169
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 93
  • Social Psychology 132
  • Gender Studies 46
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 20
Replace Stacy Winter with:
Stacy Winter United Kingdom
Jolan Kegelaers Belgium
Takehiro Iwatsuki United States
Elizabeth Campbell United Kingdom
Małgorzata Siekańska Poland
Duncan Simpson United States
Joe Baker Canada
Priscila Lopes Cardozo Brazil
Judy Van Raalte United States
Rui Resende Portugal
Fleur van Rens relative to Stacy Winter United Kingdom Stacy Winter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Stacy Winter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fleur van Rens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fleur van Rens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fleur van Rens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fleur van Rens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fleur van Rens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fleur van Rens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fleur van Rens. The network helps show where Fleur van Rens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fleur van Rens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fleur van Rens Line = papers co-authored together Fleur van Rens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201841
2 201240
3 202031
4 202027
5 201622
6 202016
7 202014
8 201913
9 201811
10 202310
11
Embedding of psycho-perceptual-motor skills can improve athlete assessment and training programs
20197
12 20217
13 20216
14 20195
15 20215
16 20194
17 20243
18 20213
19 20232
20 20212

About Fleur van Rens

Fleur van Rens is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Social Psychology, Epidemiology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (14 papers), Sports Performance and Training (10 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (8 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (4 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (169 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (93 citations), Social Psychology (132 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (20 citations). Fleur van Rens has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Agnès Elling, Simon M. Rosalie, Sean Müller, Brody Heritage, Allen G. Harbaugh, Remco Polman, Erika Borkoles, Damian Farrow, Edson Filho and Thomas Curran. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of sport and exercise, Contemporary Clinical Trials, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts and Clinical ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact