F.J. Smith

4.4k citations
120 papers · 3.4k indexed · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

F.J. Smith

115 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

F.J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
  • Applied Mathematics 347
  • Radiation 178
  • Spectroscopy 333
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 308
Replace E. R. Pike with:
E. R. Pike United Kingdom
Jon Mathews United States
D. F. Mayers United Kingdom
Robert Nyden Hill United States
Bahaa E. A. Saleh United States
J. S. Bell Switzerland
E. T. Whittaker United States
P. S. Lomdahl United States
H. L. Scott United States
William C. Davidon United States
F.J. Smith relative to E. R. Pike United Kingdom E. R. Pike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
E. R. Pike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.J. Smith. The network helps show where F.J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F.J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together F.J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996256
2 1988231
3 1983229
4 1967172
5 1964123
6 1970123
7 1971104
8 1962103
9 196392
10 197188
11 199687
12 196485
13 200275
14 196672
15 196469
16 196467
17 196866
18 196560
19 196859
20 197255

About F.J. Smith

F.J. Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Signal Processing, Materials Chemistry and Applied Mathematics, having authored 120 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech Recognition and Synthesis (27 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (22 papers), Music and Audio Processing (18 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (13 papers), Topic Modeling (11 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (8 papers) and Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Applied Mathematics (347 citations), Radiation (178 citations), Spectroscopy (333 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (308 citations). F.J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Munn, Edward A. Mason, H. O'Hara, K L Bell, J. G. Hughes, H B Gilbody, A E Kingston, Ji Ming, S. P. McGlynn and A. Dalgarno. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Molecular Physics, Computer Speech & Language, Planetary and Space Science and Electronics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact