Computer Speech & Language

41.8k citations
1.5k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Speech and Audio Processing
    • Music and Audio Processing
    • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques
    • Topic Modeling
    • Speech and dialogue systems
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques

Papers in

    • Speech and Audio Processing 583
    • Music and Audio Processing 357
    • Speech Recognition and Synthesis 762
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 506
    • Topic Modeling 419
    • Speech and dialogue systems 310
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques 85

Computer Speech & Language

1.4k papers receiving 36.9k citations

Peers

Computer Speech & Language
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
  • Signal Processing 16.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 32.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.2k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 4.2k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 824
Replace Computational Linguistics with:
Computational Linguistics United States
IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing United States
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research United States
IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing United States
International Journal of Speech Technology India
Journal of Mathematical Psychology United States
AI Magazine United States
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
Connection Science China
IEEE Signal Processing Magazine United States
Computer Speech & Language relative to Computational Linguistics United States Computational Linguistics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Computational Linguistics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computer Speech & Language

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Speech & Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Speech & Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Speech & Language more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computer Speech & Language

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Speech & Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Speech & Language.

About Computer Speech & Language

The 1.5k papers published in Computer Speech & Language in the last decades have received a total of 41.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Speech & Language usually cover Signal Processing (657 papers), Artificial Intelligence (1.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (240 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (119 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (90 papers) specifically the topics of Speech Recognition and Synthesis (762 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (583 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (506 papers), Topic Modeling (419 papers), Music and Audio Processing (357 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (310 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (187 papers) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Speech & Language are Mark Gales, Philip C. Woodland, Joshua Goodman, C.J. Leggetter, Stanley F. Chen, Roni Rosenfeld, Steve Young, S. Young, S. Levinson and Holger Schwenk.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact