Filipe C. Matheus
- Neurology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rui Daniel PredigerAderbal S. AguiarRita Raisman‐VozariRoger WalzMarcelo Libório SchwarzboldMarcelo M.S. LimaMaria A.B.F. VitalCristiane do Socorro Ferraz Maia
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers)Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
In The Last Decade
Filipe C. Matheus
32 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Neurology 369
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 366
- Physiology 209
- Molecular Biology 203
- Neurology 126
Countries citing papers authored by Filipe C. Matheus
This map shows the geographic impact of Filipe C. Matheus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Filipe C. Matheus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filipe C. Matheus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Filipe C. Matheus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Filipe C. Matheus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Filipe C. Matheus. The network helps show where Filipe C. Matheus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Filipe C. Matheus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Filipe C. Matheus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Filipe C. Matheus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Filipe C. Matheus. Filipe C. Matheus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 130 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 64 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 130 | |
| 20 | 96 |
About Filipe C. Matheus
Filipe C. Matheus is a scholar working on Physiology, Sensory Systems and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (83 citations), Neurology (369 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (366 citations). Filipe C. Matheus has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Portugal and France. Frequent co-authors include Rui Daniel Prediger, Aderbal S. Aguiar, Rita Raisman‐Vozari, Roger Walz, Marcelo Libório Schwarzbold, Marcelo M.S. Lima, Maria A.B.F. Vital, Cristiane do Socorro Ferraz Maia, Elizabeth Sumi Yamada and Francisco Bruno Teixeira. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.