Fernando Chamizo

454 citations
38 papers · 196 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Chamizo

30 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers

Fernando Chamizo
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Algebra and Number Theory 91
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 31
  • Mathematical Physics 84
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
  • Geometry and Topology 45
Replace Juan Arias de Reyna with:
Juan Arias de Reyna Spain
Laurent Habsieger France
Armin Straub United States
Klaus Wirthmüller Germany
Ludwig Bröcker Germany
Julius Borcea Sweden
Mark Losik Russia
Blair K. Spearman Canada
Peter Bundschuh Germany
Eduardo Friedman Chile
Fernando Chamizo relative to Juan Arias de Reyna Spain Juan Arias de Reyna's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Juan Arias de Reyna · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Chamizo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Chamizo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Chamizo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Chamizo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Chamizo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Chamizo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Chamizo. The network helps show where Fernando Chamizo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Chamizo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Chamizo Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Chamizo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199541
2 199913
3 199812
4 199612
5 201311
6 201711
7 200810
8 200710
9 19998
10 20038
11 20077
12 20237
13 19966
14 20115
15 19985
16 20064
17 20114
18 20233
19 20063
20 20142

About Fernando Chamizo

Fernando Chamizo is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (25 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (12 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (8 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (6 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (5 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (5 papers), advanced mathematical theories (4 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Geometry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (91 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (31 citations), Mathematical Physics (84 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and Geometry and Topology (45 citations). Fernando Chamizo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Henryk Iwaniec, Antonio Córdoba, Antonio González-Arroyo, Manuel Úbeda-Flores, Juan Fernández Sánchez, Antonio Córdoba and Eckhard Liebscher. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Arithmetica, Journal of Number Theory, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Advances in Mathematics and Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact