Fen Yan
About
In The Last Decade
Fen Yan
15 papers receiving 444 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Molecular Biology 154
- Food Science 96
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 92
- Molecular Medicine 57
- Biomedical Engineering 56
Countries citing papers authored by Fen Yan
This map shows the geographic impact of Fen Yan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fen Yan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fen Yan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fen Yan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fen Yan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fen Yan. The network helps show where Fen Yan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fen Yan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fen Yan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fen Yan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fen Yan. Fen Yan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 67 | |
| 6 | 107 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 85 | |
| 15 | 49 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.