Clinical Interventions in Aging

2.8k papers and 71.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Clinical Interventions in Aging in the last decades have received a total of 71.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Interventions in Aging usually cover Physiology (560 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (448 papers) and Surgery (447 papers) specifically the topics of Nutrition and Health in Aging (336 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (304 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (235 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Interventions in Aging are Richard W. Bohannon, Reamer L. Bushardt, Sean X. Leng, Gulshan Sharma, James S. Goodwin, Pasquale Abete, Francesco Cacciatore, David Della‐Morte, Domenico Bonaduce and Ilaria Liguori.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Interventions in Aging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Interventions in Aging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Interventions in Aging.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Interventions in Aging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Interventions in Aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Interventions in Aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Interventions in Aging more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025