Federico Botella

31 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

Federico Botella
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Family Practice 56
  • Human-Computer Interaction 46
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • Computer Science Applications 30
Replace Marcello Sarini with:
Marcello Sarini Italy
H Aylin Sapci United States
Jonathan Back United Kingdom
Jens Weber Canada
Ana Filipa Rosa Portugal
Peter Leijdekkers Australia
Jay Lundell United States
Emmanouil G. Spanakis Greece
Sven Meister Germany
Beatriz Sainz de Abajo Spain
Federico Botella relative to Marcello Sarini Italy Marcello Sarini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Marcello Sarini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federico Botella

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Botella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Botella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Botella more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Botella

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Botella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Botella. The network helps show where Federico Botella may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federico Botella, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federico Botella Line = papers co-authored together Federico Botella links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014132
2 200758
3 200338
4 202117
5 201917
6 201115
7 201311
8 201810
9 20138
10 20148
11 20148
12 20056
13 20165
14 20234
15 20223
16 20183
17 20063
18 20043
19 20123
20 20183

About Federico Botella

Federico Botella is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (3 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (56 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (46 citations), Applied Psychology (34 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations) and Computer Science Applications (30 citations). Federico Botella has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Chile and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Fernández‐Caballero, Fernando Borrás, José Joaquín Mira, Antonio Peñalver, Cristián Rusu, Nuria Toro, Domingo Orozco‐Beltrán, Susana Lorenzo, Pastora Pérez-Pérez and Isabel Navarro. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Expert Systems with Applications, El Profesional de la Informacion, The Medical Journal of Australia and Computers & Geosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact