Federica Mathis

22 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

Federica Mathis
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Applied Psychology 119
  • Literature and Literary Theory 107
  • Physiology 158
  • Epidemiology 208
  • Clinical Psychology 102
Replace Jeroen Lammers with:
Jeroen Lammers Netherlands
Eileen Goddard United Kingdom
Erika B. Litvin United States
Theodore V. Cooper United States
Kylie Morphett Australia
Sabrina Voci Canada
R. Scott Olds United States
Bianca Jardin United States
Nikole J. Cronk United States
Mariel S. Bello United States
Federica Mathis relative to Jeroen Lammers Netherlands Jeroen Lammers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jeroen Lammers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federica Mathis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Mathis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Mathis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Mathis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Mathis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Mathis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Mathis. The network helps show where Federica Mathis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Federica Mathis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federica Mathis Line = papers co-authored together Federica Mathis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201286
2 201367
3 201462
4 201153
5 200543
6 201637
7 201432
8 200624
9 201421
10 201119
11 201618
12 201118
13 201915
14 201214
15 201514
16
Psychopathological symptoms in detoxified and non-detoxified heroindependent patients entering residential treatment
201512
17 201612
18 20203
19
Deaths attributable to tobacco smoking in Italy
20082
20 20072

About Federica Mathis

Federica Mathis is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (9 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (7 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (119 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (107 citations), Physiology (158 citations), Epidemiology (208 citations) and Clinical Psychology (102 citations). Federica Mathis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fabrizio Faggiano, Helen Sweeting, Reiner Hanewinkel, Matthis Morgenstern, James D. Sargent, Kate Hunt, Ron H. J. Scholte, Ewa Florek, Rutger C. M. E. Engels and Evelien A. P. Poelen. Their work appears in journals such as Substance Use & Misuse, PEDIATRICS, Tobacco Control, European Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact