Substance Use & Misuse

4.6k papers and 73.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.6k papers published in Substance Use & Misuse in the last decades have received a total of 73.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Substance Use & Misuse usually cover Epidemiology (2.5k papers), General Health Professions (1.2k papers) and Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2.0k papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (639 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (633 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Substance Use & Misuse are Massimo Buscema, Stephen Magura, Alexandre B. Laudet, William Cloud, Robert Granfield, E. R. Oetting, Steve Sussman, Joseph F. Donnermeyer, Jennifer B. Unger and Tony Toneatto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Substance Use & Misuse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Substance Use & Misuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Substance Use & Misuse.

Countries where authors publish in Substance Use & Misuse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Substance Use & Misuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Substance Use & Misuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Substance Use & Misuse more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025