Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health14.2k
Sociology and Political Science13.1k
Replace The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse with:
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol AbuseUnited States
Drug and Alcohol ReviewAustralia
Psychology of Addictive BehaviorsUnited States
Alcohol and AlcoholismUnited States
Journal of Substance Abuse TreatmentUnited States
MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly ReportUnited States
JAMA Network OpenUnited States
European Journal of Public HealthUnited Kingdom
International Journal of Drug PolicyUnited States
PsychosomaticsUnited States
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol AbuseUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse · 1×
×0.829.6kEPIDE
×0.715.1kGHP
×0.818.2kCP
×0.912.5kPHEOH
×0.67.5kSPS
Citations per year, relative to Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Substance Use & Misuse
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Substance Use & Misuse. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Substance Use & Misuse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Substance Use & Misuse more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Substance Use & Misuse
This network shows the impact of papers published in Substance Use & Misuse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Substance Use & Misuse.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.