Tobacco Control

4.0k papers and 130.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Tobacco Control in the last decades have received a total of 130.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Tobacco Control usually cover Physiology (2.7k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (982 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (748 papers) specifically the topics of Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2.7k papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (746 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (691 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tobacco Control are Stanton A. Glantz, Geoffrey T. Fong, Joseph R. DiFranza, Melanie Wakefield, David Hammond, Ron Borland, Frank J. Chaloupka, David Hammond, Ruth E. Malone and Andrew Hyland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tobacco Control

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tobacco Control. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tobacco Control.

Countries where authors publish in Tobacco Control

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tobacco Control. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tobacco Control with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobacco Control more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025