Fatma Başak Aydemir
- Software top 5%
- Software Reliability and Analysis Research 5
- Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques 2
- Information Systems top 2%
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 16
- Software Engineering Research 14
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies 12
- Topic Modeling 2
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Business Process Modeling and Analysis 3
-
- Open Source Software Innovations 2
Fatma Başak Aydemir
27 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Software 83
- Information Systems 286
- Artificial Intelligence 224
- Management Information Systems 53
- Health Informatics 8
Countries citing papers authored by Fatma Başak Aydemir
This map shows the geographic impact of Fatma Başak Aydemir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fatma Başak Aydemir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fatma Başak Aydemir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fatma Başak Aydemir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fatma Başak Aydemir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fatma Başak Aydemir. The network helps show where Fatma Başak Aydemir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fatma Başak Aydemir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 11 | Detecting Inconsistencies of Natural Language Requirements in Satellite Ground Segment Domain. | 2019 | 4 |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 14 | Using Conceptual Models in Research Methods Courses : An experience using iStar 2.0 | 2017 | 3 |
| 15 | 2017 | 117 | |
| 16 | An empirical evaluation roadmap for iStar 2.0 | 2016 | 3 |
| 17 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 5 |
About Fatma Başak Aydemir
Fatma Başak Aydemir is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 29 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (16 papers), Software Engineering Research (14 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (12 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (5 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (2 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (83 citations), Information Systems (286 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (224 citations). Fatma Başak Aydemir has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Fabiano Dalpiaz, John Mylopoulos, Paolo Giorgini, Jennifer Horkoff, Elda Paja, Tong Li, Mattia Salnitri, Evellin Cardoso, Alejandro Maté and Luca Piras. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Sciences, Journal of Systems and Software and Information and Software Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.