Colin J. Neill

906 citations
57 papers · 548 indexed · h-index 11

Colin J. Neill

53 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Colin J. Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Software 90
  • Information Systems 365
  • Computer Science Applications 42
  • Management Information Systems 61
  • Artificial Intelligence 209
Replace Joaquín Nicolás with:
Joaquín Nicolás Spain
Philip Achimugu Nigeria
Manuel F. Bertoa Spain
Cornelius Ncube United Kingdom
Kenneth S. Rubin United States
Neil B. Harrison United States
Efi Papatheocharous Sweden
Donald C. Gause United States
Fatma Başak Aydemir Netherlands
Lucia Rapanotti United Kingdom
Colin J. Neill relative to Joaquín Nicolás Spain Joaquín Nicolás's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joaquín Nicolás · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Colin J. Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin J. Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin J. Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin J. Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin J. Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin J. Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin J. Neill. The network helps show where Colin J. Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Colin J. Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Colin J. Neill Line = papers co-authored together Colin J. Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2
Power of Predictive Analytics: Using Emotion Classification of Twitter Data for Predicting 2016 US Presidential Elections
20192
3 201910
4 20180
5 20161
6
Software Development Practices and Software Quality: A Survey
20142
7
Antipatterns : managing software organizations and people
20122
8 20121
9
Antipatterns in systems engineering: An opening trio
20122
10 20101
11 201031
12 20105
13 20083
14 20071
15 200615
16 200513
17 20042
18 20036
19 20031
20 20023

About Colin J. Neill

Colin J. Neill is a scholar working on Software, Information Systems and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 57 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (15 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (15 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (14 papers), Product Development and Customization (6 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (5 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (5 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (90 citations), Information Systems (365 citations) and Computer Science Applications (42 citations). Colin J. Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Phillip A. Laplante, Raghvinder S. Sangwan, Joanna F. DeFranco, Mohamad Kassab, Roy B. Clariana, Philip A. Laplante, Satish Srinivasan, Matthew Bass, Jon Holt and Michael J. Piovoso. Their work appears in journals such as IT Professional, Computer, Systems Engineering, IEEE Systems Journal and European Journal of Engineering Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026