Fátima Mendes Marques

12 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers

Fátima Mendes Marques
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 33
  • Infectious Diseases 19
  • Education 14
  • Sociology and Political Science 11
  • General Health Professions 8
Replace Lara Leite de Oliveira with:
Lara Leite de Oliveira Brazil
Helen Underhill United Kingdom
Jessica Fung Deerin United States
Rosa Maria Grangeiro Martins Brazil
Elizandra Cássia da Silva Oliveira Brazil
Christina A. Harden United States
Edi Albert Australia
Joyce Wright United Kingdom
Rebecca Walcott United States
Danieli Bandeira Brazil
Fátima Mendes Marques relative to Lara Leite de Oliveira Brazil Lara Leite de Oliveira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Lara Leite de Oliveira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fátima Mendes Marques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fátima Mendes Marques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fátima Mendes Marques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fátima Mendes Marques more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fátima Mendes Marques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fátima Mendes Marques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fátima Mendes Marques. The network helps show where Fátima Mendes Marques may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fátima Mendes Marques

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fátima Mendes Marques. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fátima Mendes Marques based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fátima Mendes Marques. Fátima Mendes Marques is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 4
5 0
6 3
7 0
8 2
9 6
10 5
11 1
12 11
13 31
14
Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in nursing students
2
15 1
16
A unionização das políticas educativas no contexto europeu
1
17
Entre a continuidade e a inovação. O ensino superior de Enfermagem e as práticas pedagógicas dos professores de Enfermagem
1

About Fátima Mendes Marques

Fátima Mendes Marques is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Medical Laboratory Technology and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 17 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Burnout (4 papers), Health Education and Validation (4 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (6 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and Leadership and Management (3 citations). Fátima Mendes Marques has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Maria João Alves, Hugo Costa Osório, Sílvia Silva, Ana Sofia Silva, Líbia Zé‐Zé, Celeste Simões, Lisa Gomes, Beatriz Araújo, Elena Fernández‐Martínez and Cristina Liébana‐Presa. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026