Fang‐I Lu

39 papers receiving 785 citations

Peers

Fang‐I Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health Informatics 27
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 221
  • Cancer Research 181
  • Oncology 309
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 244
Replace Kate Downey with:
Kate Downey United Kingdom
Yosep Chong South Korea
G. Stauch Germany
Chad Vanderbilt United States
Caroline Malhaire France
Maribel D. Lacambra Hong Kong
Yu‐Mee Sohn South Korea
Kazuhiro Tabata Japan
Elżbieta Łuczyńska Poland
Rasha Kamal Egypt
Fang‐I Lu relative to Kate Downey United Kingdom Kate Downey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Kate Downey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fang‐I Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fang‐I Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fang‐I Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fang‐I Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fang‐I Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fang‐I Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fang‐I Lu. The network helps show where Fang‐I Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fang‐I Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fang‐I Lu Line = papers co-authored together Fang‐I Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010152
2 201960
3 201251
4 202048
5 202148
6 201746
7 201531
8 202131
9 201830
10 202129
11 202126
12 202224
13 201924
14 202319
15 201718
16 201316
17 201815
18 202215
19 202213
20 202111

About Fang‐I Lu

Fang‐I Lu is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology, Artificial Intelligence and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 41 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (16 papers), AI in cancer detection (11 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (10 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (4 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (27 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (221 citations), Cancer Research (181 citations), Oncology (309 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (244 citations). Fang‐I Lu has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elzbieta Slodkowska, Sharon Nofech‐Mozes, Douglas Webber, David Owen, Dmitry Turbin, William T. Tran, Ali Sadeghi‐Naini, Wedad Hanna, Sonal Gandhi and Andrew Lagree. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Scientific Reports, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, Modern Pathology and The American Journal of Surgical Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact