F. R. Leavis
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 2%
- Education
- Co-authors
- G. SinghT. W. HutchisonHenry JamesJames MillRené WellekC. P. SnowJohn B. TaskerCraig E. Morris
- Topics
- Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers)Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers)Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
F. R. Leavis
25 papers receiving 205 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Literature and Literary Theory 238
- Sociology and Political Science 126
- Philosophy 80
- History 66
- Education 55
Countries citing papers authored by F. R. Leavis
This map shows the geographic impact of F. R. Leavis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. R. Leavis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. R. Leavis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. R. Leavis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. R. Leavis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. R. Leavis. The network helps show where F. R. Leavis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. R. Leavis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. R. Leavis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. R. Leavis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. R. Leavis. F. R. Leavis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | Thought, words and creativity : art and thought in Lawrence | 6 |
| 5 | Thought, words and creativity | 3 |
| 6 | Mass civilisation and minority culture | 37 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Nor shall my sword : discourses on pluralism, compassion and social hope | 29 |
| 9 | Education and the University: A Sketch for an 'English School' | 23 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Determinations : critical essays | 4 |
| 12 | English literature in our time and the university : Clark lectures 1967 | 8 |
| 13 | The image of childhood : the individual and society : a study of the theme in English literature | 44 |
| 14 | Selected literary criticism | 14 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | The Great Tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad.breakdown → | 121 |
| 18 | Poetry and Morality: Studies on the Criticism of Matthew Arnold, T.S. Eliot and F.R. Leavis | 1 |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About F. R. Leavis
F. R. Leavis is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers) and Migration, Policy, and Dickens Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (238 citations), Philosophy (80 citations) and History (66 citations). Frequent co-authors include G. Singh, T. W. Hutchison, Henry James, James Mill, René Wellek, C. P. Snow, John B. Tasker, Craig E. Morris, I. A. Richards and Basil Willey. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, Technology and Culture and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.