Virgil Nemoianu
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- History top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Marilyn ButlerWayne C. BoothThomas McFarlandVincent B. LeitchHarold BloomFriedrich SengleFrederick TurnerMorris Eaves
- Topics
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers)French Literature and Criticism (2 papers)Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRomania
In The Last Decade
Virgil Nemoianu
37 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Literature and Literary Theory 164
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- Philosophy 70
- History 48
- Political Science and International Relations 38
Countries citing papers authored by Virgil Nemoianu
This map shows the geographic impact of Virgil Nemoianu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virgil Nemoianu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virgil Nemoianu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Virgil Nemoianu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virgil Nemoianu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virgil Nemoianu. The network helps show where Virgil Nemoianu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Virgil Nemoianu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Virgil Nemoianu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Virgil Nemoianu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Virgil Nemoianu. Virgil Nemoianu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | Postmodernism and Cultural Identities: Conflicts and Coexistence | 1 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Soul of a nation | 0 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | Play, literature, religion : essays in cultural intertextuality | 1 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Virgil Nemoianu
Virgil Nemoianu is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), French Literature and Criticism (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (164 citations), Philosophy (70 citations) and Museology (17 citations). Virgil Nemoianu has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Butler, Wayne C. Booth, Thomas McFarland, Vincent B. Leitch, Harold Bloom, Friedrich Sengle, Frederick Turner, Morris Eaves, Franz Borkenau and Matei Călinescu. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Poetics Today and MLN.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.