F. H. S. Brown

461 total citations
10 papers, 334 citations indexed

About

F. H. S. Brown is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, F. H. S. Brown has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 334 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Occupational Therapy, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in F. H. S. Brown's work include Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper). F. H. S. Brown is often cited by papers focused on Occupational Health and Performance (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper). F. H. S. Brown collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. F. H. S. Brown's co-authors include Paul R. Miller, Rodney Collins, Peter Griffiths, M. H. Siegel, Karen Schwab, Brian Ivins, Deborah L. Warden, Timothy S. Clark, Alison N. Cernich and Joseph Bleiberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognition, Psychiatry Research and Economica.

In The Last Decade

F. H. S. Brown

9 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. H. S. Brown United States	6	92	81	78	72	64	10	334
James Thompson United Kingdom	11	150 1.6×	102 1.3×	62 0.8×	60 0.8×	40 0.6×	19	412
Michael J. Raymond United States	10	124 1.3×	61 0.8×	67 0.9×	67 0.9×	60 0.9×	23	342
Mary Ellen Hayden United States	10	60 0.7×	51 0.6×	41 0.5×	86 1.2×	50 0.8×	18	256
Howard Gudeman United States	7	77 0.8×	132 1.6×	63 0.8×	37 0.5×	44 0.7×	12	328
Anne O'Hanlon Australia	7	72 0.8×	143 1.8×	85 1.1×	61 0.8×	31 0.5×	14	374
Cheryl K. Hiscock United States	6	85 0.9×	136 1.7×	70 0.9×	193 2.7×	24 0.4×	9	376
Sharon Arffa United States	9	120 1.3×	130 1.6×	142 1.8×	65 0.9×	125 2.0×	12	435
Monte Scott United States	8	94 1.0×	183 2.3×	164 2.1×	32 0.4×	30 0.5×	12	441
Stanley D. Porteus United States	8	113 1.2×	188 2.3×	186 2.4×	62 0.9×	82 1.3×	24	555
Erin M. Warriner Canada	10	80 0.9×	98 1.2×	99 1.3×	117 1.6×	64 1.0×	15	415

Countries citing papers authored by F. H. S. Brown

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. H. S. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. H. S. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. H. S. Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. H. S. Brown

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. H. S. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. H. S. Brown. The network helps show where F. H. S. Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. H. S. Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. H. S. Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. H. S. Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. H. S. Brown. F. H. S. Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Roebuck‐Spencer, Tresa, Dennis Reeves, Joseph Bleiberg, et al.. (2008). Influence of Demographics on Computerized Cognitive Testing in a Military Sample. Military Psychology. 20(3). 187–203. 18 indexed citations

2.

Ivins, Brian, et al.. (2007). How Satisfied Are Soldiers with Their Ballistic Helmets? A Comparison of Soldiers' Opinions about the Advanced Combat Helmet and the Personal Armor System for Ground Troops Helmet. Military Medicine. 172(6). 586–591. 11 indexed citations

3.

Reeves, Dennis, Joseph Bleiberg, Tresa Roebuck‐Spencer, et al.. (2006). Reference Values for Performance on the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics V3.0 in an Active Duty Military Sample. Military Medicine. 171(10). 982–994. 47 indexed citations

4.

Miller, Paul R., et al.. (2001). Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 1. Accuracy of structured vs. unstructured interviews. Psychiatry Research. 105(3). 255–264. 138 indexed citations

5.

Siegel, M. H., et al.. (1993). Early childhood memories: Accuracy and affect. Cognition. 47(2). 95–119. 82 indexed citations

6.

Brown, F. H. S., et al.. (1991). An investigation of the relationship between self-report of memory functioning and memory test performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 47(6). 772–777. 27 indexed citations

7.

Brown, F. H. S., et al.. (1967). Added safety in aircraft fueling. Fire Technology. 3(3). 232–240. 2 indexed citations

8.

Brown, F. H. S., et al.. (1961). The Replacement of Obsolescent Plant. Economica. 28(111). 297–297. 5 indexed citations

9.

Brown, F. H. S., et al.. (1958). Reheat Practice in British Power Stations. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 172(1). 585–625.

10.

Brown, F. H. S., et al.. (1958). Failure of a 60-MW Steam Turbo-Generator at Uskmouth Power Station. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 172(1). 627–653. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact