F. E. S. Tan
Impact in
- Family Practice top 10%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
-
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Papers in
-
- Optimal Experimental Design Methods 3
-
- Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials 2
- Statistics Education and Methodologies 1
- Co-authors
- Ruud J.G. Halfens (1 shared paper)H. Huijer Abu‐Saad (1 shared paper)J.P.M. Diederiks (1 shared paper)Tiny Jaarsma (1 shared paper)Kathleen Dracup (1 shared paper)Jan P.H. Hamers (6 shared papers)Hilde Verbeek (3 shared papers)Hanneke C. Beerens (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Family Practice (1 paper)International Psychogeriatrics (1 paper)BMC Geriatrics (1 paper)Statistics in Medicine (1 paper)Heart & Lung (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsTaiwanNepal
In The Last Decade
F. E. S. Tan
13 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Family Practice 15
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 133
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 13
- Pharmacy 14
Countries citing papers authored by F. E. S. Tan
This map shows the geographic impact of F. E. S. Tan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. E. S. Tan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. E. S. Tan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. E. S. Tan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. E. S. Tan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. E. S. Tan. The network helps show where F. E. S. Tan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. E. S. Tan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 203 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 1 |
About F. E. S. Tan
F. E. S. Tan is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimal Experimental Design Methods (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper), Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (15 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (133 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (13 citations) and Pharmacy (14 citations). F. E. S. Tan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Taiwan and Nepal. Frequent co-authors include Ruud J.G. Halfens, H. Huijer Abu‐Saad, J.P.M. Diederiks, Tiny Jaarsma, Kathleen Dracup, Jan P.H. Hamers, Hilde Verbeek, Hanneke C. Beerens, Sandra Zwakhalen and Bram de Boer. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Family Practice, International Psychogeriatrics, BMC Geriatrics, Statistics in Medicine and Heart & Lung.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.