Eva Widerström-Noga
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Physiology top 2%
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert P. YezierskiNanna Brix FinnerupPhilip J. SiddallYenisel Cruz‐AlmeidaElizabeth R. FelixAlberto Martinez‐ArizalaDennis C. TurkFin Biering‐Sørensen
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (49 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (43 papers)Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (25 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkCanada
In The Last Decade
Eva Widerström-Noga
75 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.9k
- Pharmacology 1.4k
- Physiology 1.2k
- Rehabilitation 575
- Surgery 543
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Widerström-Noga
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Widerström-Noga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Widerström-Noga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Widerström-Noga more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Widerström-Noga
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Widerström-Noga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Widerström-Noga. The network helps show where Eva Widerström-Noga may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Widerström-Noga
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Widerström-Noga. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Widerström-Noga based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Widerström-Noga. Eva Widerström-Noga is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 82 | |
| 14 | 74 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 50 | |
| 18 | 161 | |
| 19 | 153 | |
| 20 | 85 |
About Eva Widerström-Noga
Eva Widerström-Noga is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Rehabilitation and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 81 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (49 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (43 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.9k citations), Rehabilitation (575 citations) and Pharmacology (1.4k citations). Eva Widerström-Noga has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert P. Yezierski, Nanna Brix Finnerup, Philip J. Siddall, Yenisel Cruz‐Almeida, Elizabeth R. Felix, Alberto Martinez‐Arizala, Dennis C. Turk, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Thomas N. Bryce and Robert Duncan. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neurology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.