Mark S. Nash

10.6k total citations
202 papers, 8.3k citations indexed

About

Mark S. Nash is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark S. Nash has authored 202 papers receiving a total of 8.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 100 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 46 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 43 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Mark S. Nash's work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (98 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (43 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (39 papers). Mark S. Nash is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Cord Injury Research (98 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (43 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (39 papers). Mark S. Nash collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Mark S. Nash's co-authors include Patrick L. Jacobs, Neville N. Osborne, Rachel E. Cowan, Brooks Applegate, John P. M. Wood, Robert Gailey, Glyn Chidlow, R. A. John Challiss, Jochen Kressler and Stefan R. Nahorski and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

Mark S. Nash

200 papers receiving 8.0k citations

Peers

Mark S. Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 3.7k
  • Rehabilitation 1.8k
  • Molecular Biology 1.7k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 1.6k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.6k
Replace Helle K. Iversen with:
Helle K. Iversen Denmark
Dale Corbett Canada
Andrew Eisen Canada
Hans‐Christoph Diener Germany
Wise Young United States
Craig M. McDonald United States
D. Michele Basso United States
Francesco Pierelli Italy
Jesper L. Andersen Denmark
Johannes Jakobsen Denmark
Helle K. Iversen Denmark View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mark S. Nash
Mark S. Nash · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mark S. Nash
Mark S. Nash · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Nash. The network helps show where Mark S. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Nash. Mark S. Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 1
4 2
5 26
6 12
7 37
8 7
9 11
10 25
11 79
12 30
13 93
14 32
15
Exercise reconditioning of the heart and peripheral circulation after spinal cord injury
37
16 43
17 70
18 57
19
Serotonin and melatonin receptors in retinal pigment epithelium
1
20 135

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026