Edelle C. Field‐Fote
- Rehabilitation top 0.1%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 50
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Spinal Cord Injury Research 69
- Neurology top 1%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 17
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders 7
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders 42
-
- Muscle activation and electromyography studies 18
-
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 14
-
- Effects of Vibration on Health 8
- Co-authors
- Kathryn E. RoachKristina BeekhuizenDejan TepavacJoyce Gomes‐OsmanAndrew L. ShermanMónica A. PérezMary Kay FloeterCarla F. J. Nooijen
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Edelle C. Field‐Fote
103 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Rehabilitation 1.3k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.0k
- Neurology 578
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.0k
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 184
Countries citing papers authored by Edelle C. Field‐Fote
This map shows the geographic impact of Edelle C. Field‐Fote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edelle C. Field‐Fote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edelle C. Field‐Fote more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edelle C. Field‐Fote
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edelle C. Field‐Fote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edelle C. Field‐Fote. The network helps show where Edelle C. Field‐Fote may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edelle C. Field‐Fote, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 54 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 100 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 76 | |
| 20 | 2000 | 77 |
About Edelle C. Field‐Fote
Edelle C. Field‐Fote is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 107 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (69 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (50 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (42 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (18 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (17 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Effects of Vibration on Health (8 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.0k citations) and Neurology (578 citations). Edelle C. Field‐Fote has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn E. Roach, Kristina Beekhuizen, Dejan Tepavac, Joyce Gomes‐Osman, Andrew L. Sherman, Mónica A. Pérez, Mary Kay Floeter, Carla F. J. Nooijen, Nienke ter Hoeve and Elizabeth J. Bradbury. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.