John L. K. Kramer

2.9k citations
119 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

John L. K. Kramer

110 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John L. K. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 824
  • Rehabilitation 261
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 144
  • Neurology 182
  • Physiology 539
Replace Michèle Hubli with:
Michèle Hubli Switzerland
James G. Broton United States
Annina B. Schmid United Kingdom
Paul G. Loubser United States
Eva Widerström-Noga United States
Joel G. Pickar United States
Sang Ho Ahn South Korea
Richard Eloin Liebano Brazil
Göran Leijon Sweden
Martin Ballegaard Denmark
John L. K. Kramer relative to Michèle Hubli Switzerland Michèle Hubli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michèle Hubli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John L. K. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John L. K. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John L. K. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John L. K. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John L. K. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John L. K. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John L. K. Kramer. The network helps show where John L. K. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John L. K. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John L. K. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together John L. K. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20241
4 20243
5 20233
6 20235
7 20232
8 20211
9 20217
10 20217
11 202020
12 20207
13 20204
14 202013
15 20185
16 201077
17 20080
18 20004
19 19963
20
Prentice Hall's federal taxation, 1989
19880

About John L. K. Kramer

John L. K. Kramer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rehabilitation, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Physiology, having authored 119 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (43 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (31 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (24 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (12 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (11 papers) and Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (824 citations), Rehabilitation (261 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (144 citations), Neurology (182 citations) and Physiology (539 citations). John L. K. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Armin Curt, Catherine R. Jutzeler, John D. Steeves, Jan Rösner, Jenny Haefeli, Daniel P. Lammertse, José Zariffa, Patrick Freund, Martin Schubert and Eveline Huber. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, Spinal Cord, Journal of Neurotrauma and Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026